# Group-IB Attack Surface Management vs Microsoft Defender EASM: side-by-side comparison (2026) [Group-IB Attack Surface Management](https://cybersectools.com/tools/group-ib-attack-surface-management) is a commercial [external attack surface management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/external-asm) solution by [Group IB](https://cybersectools.com/companies/group-ib). [Microsoft Defender EASM](https://cybersectools.com/tools/microsoft-defender-external-attack-surface-management) is a commercial [external attack surface management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/external-asm) solution by [Microsoft](https://cybersectools.com/companies/microsoft). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Our take What our shortlists say about the one we picked. ### [Microsoft Defender EASM](https://cybersectools.com/tools/microsoft-defender-external-attack-surface-management) Best for: Microsoft shops adding external asset discovery It belongs here if you already pay for Microsoft security, because discovered assets can move into Defender for Cloud and Copilot in Azure turns plain questions into inventory searches. It fits companies from small to enterprise. Its features center on discovery and flagging, so ask whether you also need active testing to prove which exposures are real. From [Best Attack Surface Management Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-attack-surface-solutions), Fall 2026. Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about). Need the answer fast? [Best Attack Surface Management Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-attack-surface-solutions) picks Palo Alto Networks Cortex Xpanse, Microsoft Defender EASM, Google Mandiant Attack Surface Management and 4 more. ## Side-by-side comparison | | Group-IB Attack Surface Management | Microsoft Defender EASM | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | External Attack Surface Management | External Attack Surface Management | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Cloud | Cloud | | Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | Group IB | Microsoft | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Group-IB Attack Surface Management | Microsoft Defender EASM | |---|---|---| | Visualization | Yes | – | ### Core features **Group-IB Attack Surface Management** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Microsoft Defender EASM** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Group-IB Attack Surface Management** No integrations listed. **Microsoft Defender EASM** 4 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Group-IB Attack Surface Management vs Microsoft Defender EASM FAQ Common questions when comparing Group-IB Attack Surface Management vs Microsoft Defender EASM for external attack surface management. ### What is the difference between Group-IB Attack Surface Management and Microsoft Defender EASM? **Group-IB Attack Surface Management**: External attack surface management platform with threat intelligence, built by Group IB. **Microsoft Defender EASM**: Discovers and monitors external-facing assets and vulnerabilities, built by Microsoft. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Group-IB Attack Surface Management and Microsoft Defender EASM? **Group-IB Attack Surface Management** is made by Group IB. **Microsoft Defender EASM** is made by Microsoft. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Group-IB Attack Surface Management a good alternative to Microsoft Defender EASM? Often, yes. Group-IB Attack Surface Management and Microsoft Defender EASM are both External Attack Surface Management products. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Group-IB Attack Surface Management vs Aleph Search](https://cybersectools.com/compare/aleph-search-clear-vs-group-ib-attack-surface-management) - [Group-IB Attack Surface Management vs Outpost24 External Attack Surface Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/group-ib-attack-surface-management-vs-outpost24-external-attack-surface-management) - [Group-IB Attack Surface Management vs StrikeOne Attack Surfa](https://cybersectools.com/compare/group-ib-attack-surface-management-vs-strikeone-attack-surfa) - [Microsoft Defender EASM vs Aleph Search](https://cybersectools.com/compare/aleph-search-clear-vs-microsoft-defender-external-attack-surface-management) - [Microsoft Defender EASM vs Outpost24 External Attack Surface Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/microsoft-defender-external-attack-surface-management-vs-outpost24-external-attack-surface-management) - [Microsoft Defender EASM vs StrikeOne Attack Surfa](https://cybersectools.com/compare/microsoft-defender-external-attack-surface-management-vs-strikeone-attack-surfa) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Group-IB Attack Surface Management alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/group-ib-attack-surface-management) - [See all Microsoft Defender EASM alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/microsoft-defender-external-attack-surface-management) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/group-ib-attack-surface-management-vs-microsoft-defender-external-attack-surface-management For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/group-ib-attack-surface-management.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Group-IB Attack Surface Management and Microsoft Defender EASM: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md