# Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL vs METCLOUD Patch Management Services: side-by-side comparison (2026) [Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL](https://cybersectools.com/tools/greenbone-openvas-control) is a commercial [vulnerability assessment](https://cybersectools.com/categories/vulnerability-assessment) solution by [Greenbone AG](https://cybersectools.com/companies/greenbone-ag). [METCLOUD Patch Management Services](https://cybersectools.com/tools/metcloud-patch-management-services) is a commercial [vulnerability assessment](https://cybersectools.com/categories/vulnerability-assessment) solution by [METCLOUD](https://cybersectools.com/companies/metcloud). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Side-by-side comparison | | Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL | METCLOUD Patch Management Services | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Vulnerability Assessment | Vulnerability Assessment | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Hybrid | Cloud | | Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Startup, SMB | | Company | Greenbone AG | METCLOUD | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL | METCLOUD Patch Management Services | |---|---|---| | REST API | Yes | – | | Configuration Management | Yes | Yes | | Patch Management | – | Yes | | Vulnerability | – | Yes | | Security Compliance Training | – | Yes | | Outsourced Security | – | Yes | | Security Reporting | – | Yes | | Security as a Service | – | Yes | | Inventory | – | Yes | ### Core features **Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **METCLOUD Patch Management Services** 6 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL** 2 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **METCLOUD Patch Management Services** 1 integration listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL](https://cybersectools.com/tools/greenbone-openvas-control) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options and you are a mid-market company or an enterprise. - [METCLOUD Patch Management Services](https://cybersectools.com/tools/metcloud-patch-management-services) fits if you want a cloud product and you are a startup. ## Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL vs METCLOUD Patch Management Services FAQ Common questions when comparing Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL vs METCLOUD Patch Management Services for vulnerability assessment. ### What is the difference between Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL and METCLOUD Patch Management Services? **Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL**: Centralized management platform for Greenbone vulnerability management systems. Built by Greenbone AG. **METCLOUD Patch Management Services**: Managed service for deploying and tracking software patches across IT infrastructure. Built by METCLOUD. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL and METCLOUD Patch Management Services? **Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL** is made by Greenbone AG. **METCLOUD Patch Management Services** is made by METCLOUD. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL a good alternative to METCLOUD Patch Management Services? Often, yes. Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL and METCLOUD Patch Management Services are both Vulnerability Assessment products, and both cover Configuration Management. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL vs Deepwatch Vulnerability Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/deepwatch-vulnerability-management-vs-greenbone-openvas-control) - [Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL vs Nanitor](https://cybersectools.com/compare/greenbone-openvas-control-vs-nanitor) - [Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL vs UVM: Unified Vulnerability Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/greenbone-openvas-control-vs-uvm-unified-vulnerability-management) - [METCLOUD Patch Management Services vs Deepwatch Vulnerability Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/deepwatch-vulnerability-management-vs-metcloud-patch-management-services) - [METCLOUD Patch Management Services vs Nanitor](https://cybersectools.com/compare/metcloud-patch-management-services-vs-nanitor) - [METCLOUD Patch Management Services vs UVM: Unified Vulnerability Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/metcloud-patch-management-services-vs-uvm-unified-vulnerability-management) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/greenbone-openvas-control) - [See all METCLOUD Patch Management Services alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/metcloud-patch-management-services) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/greenbone-openvas-control-vs-metcloud-patch-management-services For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/greenbone-openvas-control.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Greenbone OPENVAS CONTROL and METCLOUD Patch Management Services: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md