# Forescout Device Compliance vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access: side-by-side comparison (2026) [Forescout Device Compliance](https://cybersectools.com/tools/forescout-device-compliance) is a commercial [network access control](https://cybersectools.com/categories/nac) solution by [Forescout Technologies, Inc](https://cybersectools.com/companies/forescout-technologies-inc). [QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/quantlayer-secure-remote-access) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [BDATA](https://cybersectools.com/companies/bdata). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Side-by-side comparison | | Forescout Device Compliance | QuantLayer Secure Remote Access | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Network Access Control | Zero Trust Network Access | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Hybrid | Cloud | | Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | Forescout Technologies, Inc. | BDATA | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Forescout Device Compliance | QuantLayer Secure Remote Access | |---|---|---| | IoT Security | Yes | – | | Network Visibility | Yes | – | | ZTNA | – | Yes | | Remote Access | – | Yes | | MFA | – | Yes | | Least Privilege | – | Yes | | Zero Trust Architecture | – | Yes | | SSH | – | Yes | | RDP | – | Yes | | Authentication | – | Yes | | SSO | – | Yes | ### Core features **Forescout Device Compliance** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **QuantLayer Secure Remote Access** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Forescout Device Compliance** 16 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **QuantLayer Secure Remote Access** 22 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [Forescout Device Compliance](https://cybersectools.com/tools/forescout-device-compliance) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options and you are a small business. - [QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/quantlayer-secure-remote-access) fits if you want a cloud product. ## Forescout Device Compliance vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access FAQ Common questions when comparing Forescout Device Compliance vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access for network access control. ### What is the difference between Forescout Device Compliance and QuantLayer Secure Remote Access? **Forescout Device Compliance**: Continuously monitors and enforces compliance of all connected devices. Built by Forescout Technologies, Inc. **QuantLayer Secure Remote Access**: Passwordless, identity-first ZTNA replacing VPNs with per-resource access control. Built by BDATA. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Forescout Device Compliance and QuantLayer Secure Remote Access? **Forescout Device Compliance** is made by Forescout Technologies, Inc. **QuantLayer Secure Remote Access** is made by BDATA. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Forescout Device Compliance a good alternative to QuantLayer Secure Remote Access? In part. Forescout Device Compliance and QuantLayer Secure Remote Access are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Forescout Device Compliance vs Genians Execution Layer](https://cybersectools.com/compare/forescout-device-compliance-vs-genians-execution-layer) - [Forescout Device Compliance vs Auconet BICS](https://cybersectools.com/compare/auconet-bics-vs-forescout-device-compliance) - [Forescout Device Compliance vs Nile Secure](https://cybersectools.com/compare/forescout-device-compliance-vs-nile-secure) - [QuantLayer Secure Remote Access vs Genians Execution Layer](https://cybersectools.com/compare/genians-execution-layer-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access) - [QuantLayer Secure Remote Access vs Auconet BICS](https://cybersectools.com/compare/auconet-bics-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access) - [QuantLayer Secure Remote Access vs Nile Secure](https://cybersectools.com/compare/nile-secure-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Forescout Device Compliance alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/forescout-device-compliance) - [See all QuantLayer Secure Remote Access alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/quantlayer-secure-remote-access) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/forescout-device-compliance-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/forescout-device-compliance.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Forescout Device Compliance and QuantLayer Secure Remote Access: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md