# FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) vs RunSybil: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/foca-fingerprinting-organizations-with-collected-archives) is a free [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution. [RunSybil](https://cybersectools.com/tools/runsybil) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [RunSybil](https://cybersectools.com/companies/runsybil). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free | Commercial |
| Category | Penetration Testing | Penetration Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | On-Premises | Cloud |
| Company size fit | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| GitHub stars | 3,451 | – |
| Last commit | Aug 2021 | – |
| Company | – | RunSybil |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| File Analysis | Yes | – |
| AI Pentesting | – | Yes |
| Attack Paths | – | Yes |
| Continuous Testing | – | Yes |
| Vulnerability Prioritization | – | Yes |
| Reconnaissance | – | Yes |
| DAST | – | Yes |
| Red Team | – | Yes |
| Security Scanning | – | Yes |
| Vulnerability | – | Yes |
| Cloud Native | – | Yes |

### Core features

**FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives)**

No features listed.

**RunSybil**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/foca-fingerprinting-organizations-with-collected-archives) fits if you need to run it on your own servers, you are a startup, you need a free product and you want an open-source product.
- [RunSybil](https://cybersectools.com/tools/runsybil) fits if you want a cloud product.

## FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) vs RunSybil FAQ

Common questions when comparing FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) vs RunSybil for penetration testing.

### What is the difference between FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) and RunSybil?

**FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives)**: FOCA is a tool used to find metadata and hidden information in scanned documents, with capabilities to analyze various file types and extract EXIF information.

**RunSybil**: AI-driven continuous attack surface assessment and validation platform. Built by RunSybil.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) and RunSybil?

**FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives)** is open-source with 3,451 GitHub stars. **RunSybil** is made by RunSybil. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) a good alternative to RunSybil?

Often, yes. FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) and RunSybil are both Penetration Testing products. Key differences: FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) is Free while RunSybil is Commercial, FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) vs AI Pentest Copilot](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ai-pentest-copilot-vs-foca-fingerprinting-organizations-with-collected-archives)
- [FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) vs NetSPI Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/foca-fingerprinting-organizations-with-collected-archives-vs-netspi-platform)
- [FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) vs Strike PTaaS](https://cybersectools.com/compare/foca-fingerprinting-organizations-with-collected-archives-vs-strike-ptaas)
- [RunSybil vs AI Pentest Copilot](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ai-pentest-copilot-vs-runsybil)
- [RunSybil vs NetSPI Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/netspi-platform-vs-runsybil)
- [RunSybil vs Strike PTaaS](https://cybersectools.com/compare/runsybil-vs-strike-ptaas)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/foca-fingerprinting-organizations-with-collected-archives)
- [See all RunSybil alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/runsybil)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/foca-fingerprinting-organizations-with-collected-archives-vs-runsybil

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/foca-fingerprinting-organizations-with-collected-archives.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on FOCA (Fingerprinting Organizations with Collected Archives) and RunSybil: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md