# Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence vs Joi Security: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence](https://cybersectools.com/tools/flyingduck-code-security-intelligence) is a commercial [static application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/sast) solution by [Flyingduck](https://cybersectools.com/companies/flyingduck). [Joi Security](https://cybersectools.com/tools/joi-security) is a free [static application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/sast) solution. Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

Need the answer fast? [Best SAST Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-sast-solutions) picks Checkmarx One Application Security Platform, Veracode Application Risk Management Platform, OpenText Fortify SAST and 4 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence | Joi Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Free |
| Category | Static Application Security Testing | Static Application Security Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Cloud | On-Premises |
| Company size fit | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market |
| GitHub stars | – | 44 |
| Last commit | – | Jan 2024 |
| Company | Flyingduck | – |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence | Joi Security |
|---|---|---|
| License Compliance | Yes | – |
| SBOM | Yes | – |
| SCA | Yes | – |
| SQL Injection | – | Yes |
| SSRF | – | Yes |
| Node.js | – | Yes |
| XSS | – | Yes |
| RCE | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Joi Security**

No features listed.

### Integrations

**Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence**

1 integration listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Joi Security**

No integrations listed.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence](https://cybersectools.com/tools/flyingduck-code-security-intelligence) fits if you want a cloud product and you are an enterprise.
- [Joi Security](https://cybersectools.com/tools/joi-security) fits if you need to run it on your own servers, you need a free product and you want an open-source product.

## Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence vs Joi Security FAQ

Common questions when comparing Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence vs Joi Security for static application security testing.

### What is the difference between Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence and Joi Security?

**Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence**: SAST tool that detects logical flaws and business logic vulnerabilities. Built by Flyingduck.

**Joi Security**: A CLI tool that performs security assessments on Joi validator schemas by testing them against various attack vectors including XSS, SQL injection, RCE, and SSRF.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence and Joi Security?

**Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence** is made by Flyingduck. **Joi Security** is open-source with 44 GitHub stars. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence a good alternative to Joi Security?

Often, yes. Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence and Joi Security are both Static Application Security Testing products. Key differences: Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence is Commercial while Joi Security is Free, Joi Security is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence vs QuestorAI](https://cybersectools.com/compare/flyingduck-code-security-intelligence-vs-questorai-vulndna)
- [Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence vs Data Theorem Code SAST Secure](https://cybersectools.com/compare/data-theorem-code-sast-secure-vs-flyingduck-code-security-intelligence)
- [Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence vs SOOS SAST](https://cybersectools.com/compare/flyingduck-code-security-intelligence-vs-soos-sast)
- [Joi Security vs QuestorAI](https://cybersectools.com/compare/joi-security-vs-questorai-vulndna)
- [Joi Security vs Data Theorem Code SAST Secure](https://cybersectools.com/compare/data-theorem-code-sast-secure-vs-joi-security)
- [Joi Security vs SOOS SAST](https://cybersectools.com/compare/joi-security-vs-soos-sast)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/flyingduck-code-security-intelligence)
- [See all Joi Security alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/joi-security)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/flyingduck-code-security-intelligence-vs-joi-security

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/flyingduck-code-security-intelligence.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence and Joi Security: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md
