# Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking vs TBV (Trust but Verify): side-by-side comparison (2026) [Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking](https://cybersectools.com/tools/fluid-attacks-continuous-hacking) is a commercial [application security posture management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/aspm) solution by [Fluid Attacks](https://cybersectools.com/companies/fluid-attacks). [TBV (Trust but Verify)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/tbv-trust-but-verify) is a free [software supply chain security](https://cybersectools.com/categories/software-supply-chain-security) solution. Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Side-by-side comparison | | Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking | TBV (Trust but Verify) | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Free | | Category | Application Security Posture Management | Software Supply Chain Security | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Cloud | On-Premises | | Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | GitHub stars | – | 61 | | Last commit | – | Dec 2021 | | Company | Fluid Attacks | – | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking | TBV (Trust but Verify) | |---|---|---| | CI/CD | Yes | – | | DAST | Yes | – | | DevSecOps | Yes | – | | SBOM | Yes | – | | SCA | Yes | – | | npm | – | Yes | ### Core features **Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **TBV (Trust but Verify)** No features listed. ### Integrations **Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking** 7 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **TBV (Trust but Verify)** No integrations listed. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking](https://cybersectools.com/tools/fluid-attacks-continuous-hacking) fits if you want a cloud product. - [TBV (Trust but Verify)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/tbv-trust-but-verify) fits if you need to run it on your own servers, you are a startup, you need a free product and you want an open-source product. ## Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking vs TBV (Trust but Verify) FAQ Common questions when comparing Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking vs TBV (Trust but Verify) for application security posture management. ### What is the difference between Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking and TBV (Trust but Verify)? **Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking**: AI-powered AppSec platform combining automated testing with pentesting, built by Fluid Attacks. **TBV (Trust but Verify)**: Package verification tool for npm with various verification and testing capabilities. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking and TBV (Trust but Verify)? **Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking** is made by Fluid Attacks. **TBV (Trust but Verify)** is open-source with 61 GitHub stars. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking a good alternative to TBV (Trust but Verify)? In part. Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking and TBV (Trust but Verify) are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Key differences: Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking is Commercial while TBV (Trust but Verify) is Free, TBV (Trust but Verify) is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking vs Strobes Application Security Posture Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/fluid-attacks-continuous-hacking-vs-strobes-application-security-posture-management) - [Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking vs Cantina Apex](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cantina-apex-vs-fluid-attacks-continuous-hacking) - [Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking vs DigitSec Automated Application Security Testing](https://cybersectools.com/compare/digitsec-automated-application-security-testing-vs-fluid-attacks-continuous-hacking) - [TBV (Trust but Verify) vs Strobes Application Security Posture Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/strobes-application-security-posture-management-vs-tbv-trust-but-verify) - [TBV (Trust but Verify) vs Cantina Apex](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cantina-apex-vs-tbv-trust-but-verify) - [TBV (Trust but Verify) vs DigitSec Automated Application Security Testing](https://cybersectools.com/compare/digitsec-automated-application-security-testing-vs-tbv-trust-but-verify) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/fluid-attacks-continuous-hacking) - [See all TBV (Trust but Verify) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/tbv-trust-but-verify) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/fluid-attacks-continuous-hacking-vs-tbv-trust-but-verify For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/fluid-attacks-continuous-hacking.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking and TBV (Trust but Verify): funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md