# Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking vs OX Application Security: side-by-side comparison (2026) [Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking](https://cybersectools.com/tools/fluid-attacks-continuous-hacking) is a commercial [application security posture management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/aspm) solution by [Fluid Attacks](https://cybersectools.com/companies/fluid-attacks). [OX Application Security](https://cybersectools.com/tools/ox-application-security) is a commercial [application security posture management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/aspm) solution by [OX Security](https://cybersectools.com/companies/ox-security). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Our take What our shortlists say about the one we picked. ### [OX Application Security](https://cybersectools.com/tools/ox-application-security) Best for: Teams with many scanners that need one ranked view It earns its place because it sits above your scanners and decides what to fix first, which suits a team drowning in findings from several products. Ask how much of its value depends on connecting your runtime, since reachability is where it differs most. From [Best Application Security Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-application-security-solutions), Fall 2026. Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about). ## Side-by-side comparison | | Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking | OX Application Security | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Application Security Posture Management | Application Security Posture Management | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Cloud | Cloud | | Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | Fluid Attacks | OX Security | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking | OX Application Security | |---|---|---| | CI/CD | Yes | Yes | | DAST | Yes | – | | DevSecOps | Yes | – | | SBOM | Yes | – | | SCA | Yes | – | | Supply Chain Security | – | Yes | ### Core features **Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **OX Application Security** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking** 7 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **OX Application Security** 50 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking vs OX Application Security FAQ Common questions when comparing Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking vs OX Application Security for application security posture management. ### What is the difference between Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking and OX Application Security? **Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking**: AI-powered AppSec platform combining automated testing with pentesting, built by Fluid Attacks. **OX Application Security**: ASPM platform with Code Projection tech for SDLC risk prioritization, built by OX Security. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking and OX Application Security? **Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking** is made by Fluid Attacks. **OX Application Security** is made by OX Security. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking a good alternative to OX Application Security? Often, yes. Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking and OX Application Security are both Application Security Posture Management products, and both cover CI/CD. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking vs Strobes Application Security Posture Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/fluid-attacks-continuous-hacking-vs-strobes-application-security-posture-management) - [Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking vs Veracode Comprehensive Application Risk Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/fluid-attacks-continuous-hacking-vs-veracode-comprehensive-application-risk-management) - [Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking vs Cantina Apex](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cantina-apex-vs-fluid-attacks-continuous-hacking) - [OX Application Security vs Strobes Application Security Posture Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ox-application-security-vs-strobes-application-security-posture-management) - [OX Application Security vs Veracode Comprehensive Application Risk Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ox-application-security-vs-veracode-comprehensive-application-risk-management) - [OX Application Security vs Cantina Apex](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cantina-apex-vs-ox-application-security) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/fluid-attacks-continuous-hacking) - [See all OX Application Security alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/ox-application-security) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/fluid-attacks-continuous-hacking-vs-ox-application-security For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/fluid-attacks-continuous-hacking.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Fluid Attacks Continuous Hacking and OX Application Security: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md