# Firezone vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Firezone](https://cybersectools.com/tools/firezone) is a free [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution. [ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [ThreatLocker](https://cybersectools.com/companies/threatlocker). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

Need the answer fast? [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions) picks Zscaler Private Access (ZPA), Netskope One Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access ZTNA 2.0 and 4 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Firezone | ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free | Commercial |
| Category | Zero Trust Network Access | Zero Trust Network Access |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Company size fit | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| GitHub stars | 8,520 | – |
| Last commit | Mar 2026 | – |
| Company | – | ThreatLocker |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Firezone | ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access |
|---|---|---|
| WireGuard | Yes | – |
| Remote Access | Yes | Yes |
| ZTNA | – | Yes |
| Zero Trust Architecture | – | Yes |
| Lateral Movement | – | Yes |
| Authorization | – | Yes |
| Network Protection | – | Yes |
| Hybrid Work | – | Yes |
| RDP | – | Yes |
| Policy | – | Yes |
| Least Privilege | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Firezone**

No features listed.

**ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access**

7 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Firezone](https://cybersectools.com/tools/firezone) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options, you are a startup, you need a free product and you want an open-source product.
- [ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access) fits if you want a cloud product.

## Firezone vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access FAQ

Common questions when comparing Firezone vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access for zero trust network access.

### What is the difference between Firezone and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access?

**Firezone**: An open source platform for secure remote access management with granular access control.

**ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access**: ZTNA that brokers access from authorized users/devices to internal resources, no VPN. Built by ThreatLocker.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Firezone and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access?

**Firezone** is open-source with 8,520 GitHub stars. **ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access** is made by ThreatLocker. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Firezone a good alternative to ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access?

Often, yes. Firezone and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access are both Zero Trust Network Access products, and both cover Remote Access. Key differences: Firezone is Free while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access is Commercial, Firezone is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Firezone vs Threatmatic Zero Trust Edge](https://cybersectools.com/compare/firezone-vs-threatmatic-zero-trust-edge)
- [Firezone vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/firezone-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access)
- [Firezone vs Alkira Zero Trust Network Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/alkira-ztna-vs-firezone)
- [ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access vs Threatmatic Zero Trust Edge](https://cybersectools.com/compare/threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access-vs-threatmatic-zero-trust-edge)
- [ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/quantlayer-secure-remote-access-vs-threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access)
- [ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access vs Alkira Zero Trust Network Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/alkira-ztna-vs-threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Firezone alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/firezone)
- [See all ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/firezone-vs-threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/firezone.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Firezone and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md