# Firezone vs Microsoft Entra Private Access: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Firezone](https://cybersectools.com/tools/firezone) is a free [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution. [Microsoft Entra Private Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/microsoft-entra-private-access) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [Microsoft](https://cybersectools.com/companies/microsoft). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Our take

What our shortlists say about the one we picked.

### [Microsoft Entra Private Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/microsoft-entra-private-access)

Best for: Companies that run identity on Microsoft Entra ID

If identity already runs on Entra ID, this reuses your Conditional Access rules as access rules, so there is no second policy engine to run. The MFA for legacy protocols suits mid-market and enterprise estates with older Windows apps. Check licensing first, because users also need Entra ID P1 or P2.

From [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions), Fall 2026.

Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about).

Need the answer fast? [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions) picks Zscaler Private Access (ZPA), Netskope One Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access ZTNA 2.0 and 4 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Firezone | Microsoft Entra Private Access |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free | Commercial |
| Category | Zero Trust Network Access | Zero Trust Network Access |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Company size fit | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| GitHub stars | 8,520 | – |
| Last commit | Mar 2026 | – |
| Company | – | Microsoft |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Firezone | Microsoft Entra Private Access |
|---|---|---|
| WireGuard | Yes | – |
| Remote Access | Yes | Yes |
| BYOD | – | Yes |
| Least Privilege | – | Yes |
| SSO | – | Yes |
| ZTNA | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Firezone**

No features listed.

**Microsoft Entra Private Access**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**Firezone**

No integrations listed.

**Microsoft Entra Private Access**

9 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Firezone](https://cybersectools.com/tools/firezone) fits if you are a startup or a small business, you need a free product and you want an open-source product.

## Firezone vs Microsoft Entra Private Access FAQ

Common questions when comparing Firezone vs Microsoft Entra Private Access for zero trust network access.

### What is the difference between Firezone and Microsoft Entra Private Access?

**Firezone**: An open source platform for secure remote access management with granular access control.

**Microsoft Entra Private Access**: Identity-based zero trust access to private apps that replaces the legacy VPN. Built by Microsoft.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Firezone and Microsoft Entra Private Access?

**Firezone** is open-source with 8,520 GitHub stars. **Microsoft Entra Private Access** is made by Microsoft. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Firezone a good alternative to Microsoft Entra Private Access?

Often, yes. Firezone and Microsoft Entra Private Access are both Zero Trust Network Access products, and both cover Remote Access. Key differences: Firezone is Free while Microsoft Entra Private Access is Commercial, Firezone is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Firezone vs GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture](https://cybersectools.com/compare/firezone-vs-goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture)
- [Firezone vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/firezone-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access)
- [Firezone vs Alkira Zero Trust Network Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/alkira-ztna-vs-firezone)
- [Microsoft Entra Private Access vs GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture](https://cybersectools.com/compare/goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture-vs-microsoft-entra-private-access)
- [Microsoft Entra Private Access vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/microsoft-entra-private-access-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access)
- [Microsoft Entra Private Access vs Alkira Zero Trust Network Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/alkira-ztna-vs-microsoft-entra-private-access)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Firezone alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/firezone)
- [See all Microsoft Entra Private Access alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/microsoft-entra-private-access)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/firezone-vs-microsoft-entra-private-access

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/firezone.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Firezone and Microsoft Entra Private Access: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md