# Firezone vs GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Firezone](https://cybersectools.com/tools/firezone) is a free [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution. [GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture](https://cybersectools.com/tools/goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [GoodAccess](https://cybersectools.com/companies/goodaccess). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

Need the answer fast? [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions) picks Zscaler Private Access (ZPA), Netskope One Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access ZTNA 2.0 and 4 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Firezone | GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free | Commercial |
| Category | Zero Trust Network Access | Zero Trust Network Access |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Company size fit | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| GitHub stars | 8,520 | – |
| Last commit | Mar 2026 | – |
| Company | – | GoodAccess |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Firezone | GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture |
|---|---|---|
| WireGuard | Yes | – |
| Remote Access | Yes | Yes |
| BYOD | – | Yes |
| SSO | – | Yes |
| ZTNA | – | Yes |
| Zero Trust Architecture | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Firezone**

No features listed.

**GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**Firezone**

No integrations listed.

**GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture**

4 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Firezone](https://cybersectools.com/tools/firezone) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options, you need a free product and you want an open-source product.
- [GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture](https://cybersectools.com/tools/goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture) fits if you want a cloud product.

## Firezone vs GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture FAQ

Common questions when comparing Firezone vs GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture for zero trust network access.

### What is the difference between Firezone and GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture?

**Firezone**: An open source platform for secure remote access management with granular access control.

**GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture**: SaaS platform providing zero trust network access for secure remote access. Built by GoodAccess.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Firezone and GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture?

**Firezone** is open-source with 8,520 GitHub stars. **GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture** is made by GoodAccess. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Firezone a good alternative to GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture?

Often, yes. Firezone and GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture are both Zero Trust Network Access products, and both cover Remote Access. Key differences: Firezone is Free while GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture is Commercial, Firezone is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Firezone vs Microsoft Entra Private Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/firezone-vs-microsoft-entra-private-access)
- [Firezone vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/firezone-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access)
- [Firezone vs NetBird Secure](https://cybersectools.com/compare/firezone-vs-netbird-secure)
- [GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture vs Microsoft Entra Private Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture-vs-microsoft-entra-private-access)
- [GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access)
- [GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture vs NetBird Secure](https://cybersectools.com/compare/goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture-vs-netbird-secure)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Firezone alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/firezone)
- [See all GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/firezone-vs-goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/firezone.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Firezone and GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md