# Firezone vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access: side-by-side comparison (2026) [Firezone](https://cybersectools.com/tools/firezone-ojlax) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [Firezone](https://cybersectools.com/companies/firezone). [QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/quantlayer-secure-remote-access) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [BDATA](https://cybersectools.com/companies/bdata). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. Need the answer fast? [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions) picks Zscaler Private Access (ZPA), Netskope One Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access ZTNA 2.0 and 4 more. ## Side-by-side comparison | | Firezone | QuantLayer Secure Remote Access | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Zero Trust Network Access | Zero Trust Network Access | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Hybrid | Cloud | | Company size fit | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | Firezone | BDATA | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Firezone | QuantLayer Secure Remote Access | |---|---|---| | ZTNA | Yes | Yes | | WireGuard | Yes | – | | Open Source | Yes | – | | Remote Access | Yes | Yes | | Infrastructure | Yes | – | | MFA | – | Yes | | Least Privilege | – | Yes | | Zero Trust Architecture | – | Yes | | SSH | – | Yes | | RDP | – | Yes | | Authentication | – | Yes | | SSO | – | Yes | ### Core features **Firezone** 9 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **QuantLayer Secure Remote Access** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Firezone** 4 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **QuantLayer Secure Remote Access** 22 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [Firezone](https://cybersectools.com/tools/firezone-ojlax) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options and you are a startup or a small business. - [QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/quantlayer-secure-remote-access) fits if you want a cloud product. ## Firezone vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access FAQ Common questions when comparing Firezone vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access for zero trust network access. ### What is the difference between Firezone and QuantLayer Secure Remote Access? **Firezone**: Open-source WireGuard-based ZTNA platform for secure resource access, built by Firezone. **QuantLayer Secure Remote Access**: Passwordless, identity-first ZTNA replacing VPNs with per-resource access control, built by BDATA. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Firezone and QuantLayer Secure Remote Access? **Firezone** is made by Firezone. **QuantLayer Secure Remote Access** is made by BDATA. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Firezone a good alternative to QuantLayer Secure Remote Access? Often, yes. Firezone and QuantLayer Secure Remote Access are both Zero Trust Network Access products, and both cover ZTNA, Remote Access. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Firezone vs NoPorts](https://cybersectools.com/compare/firezone-ojlax-vs-noports) - [Firezone vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/firezone-ojlax-vs-threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access) - [Firezone vs Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine](https://cybersectools.com/compare/firezone-ojlax-vs-primary-zero-trust-policy-engine) - [QuantLayer Secure Remote Access vs NoPorts](https://cybersectools.com/compare/noports-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access) - [QuantLayer Secure Remote Access vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/quantlayer-secure-remote-access-vs-threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access) - [QuantLayer Secure Remote Access vs Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine](https://cybersectools.com/compare/primary-zero-trust-policy-engine-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Firezone alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/firezone-ojlax) - [See all QuantLayer Secure Remote Access alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/quantlayer-secure-remote-access) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/firezone-ojlax-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/firezone-ojlax.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Firezone and QuantLayer Secure Remote Access: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md