# Filigran OpenAEV vs Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Filigran OpenAEV](https://cybersectools.com/tools/filigran-openaev) is a commercial [breach & attack simulation](https://cybersectools.com/categories/threat-simulation) solution by [Filigran](https://cybersectools.com/companies/filigran). [Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation](https://cybersectools.com/tools/skyhawk-breach-and-attack-simulation) is a commercial [breach & attack simulation](https://cybersectools.com/categories/threat-simulation) solution by [Skyhawk Security](https://cybersectools.com/companies/skyhawk-security). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Filigran OpenAEV | Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | Breach & Attack Simulation | Breach & Attack Simulation |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | Filigran | Skyhawk Security |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Filigran OpenAEV | Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation |
|---|---|---|
| MITRE ATT&CK | Yes | – |
| Open Source | Yes | – |
| Red Team | Yes | Yes |
| Security Validation | Yes | Yes |
| Cyber Threat Intelligence | Yes | – |
| Attack Paths | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Filigran OpenAEV**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation**

8 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**Filigran OpenAEV**

2 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation**

No integrations listed.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Filigran OpenAEV](https://cybersectools.com/tools/filigran-openaev) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options and you are a small business.
- [Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation](https://cybersectools.com/tools/skyhawk-breach-and-attack-simulation) fits if you want a cloud product.

## Filigran OpenAEV vs Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation FAQ

Common questions when comparing Filigran OpenAEV vs Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation for breach & attack simulation.

### What is the difference between Filigran OpenAEV and Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation?

**Filigran OpenAEV**: Open-source threat-informed exposure validation platform for attack simulation. Built by Filigran.

**Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation**: Cloud BAS tool that continuously simulates attacks to identify exploitable paths. Built by Skyhawk Security.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Filigran OpenAEV and Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation?

**Filigran OpenAEV** is made by Filigran. **Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation** is made by Skyhawk Security. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Filigran OpenAEV a good alternative to Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation?

Often, yes. Filigran OpenAEV and Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation are both Breach & Attack Simulation products, and both cover Red Team, Security Validation. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Filigran OpenAEV vs NetSPI Detective Controls Testing](https://cybersectools.com/compare/filigran-openaev-vs-netspi-detective-controls-testing)
- [Filigran OpenAEV vs SafeBreach Exposure Validation Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/filigran-openaev-vs-safebreach-exposure-validation-platform)
- [Filigran OpenAEV vs FourCore ATTACK](https://cybersectools.com/compare/filigran-openaev-vs-fourcore-attack)
- [Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation vs NetSPI Detective Controls Testing](https://cybersectools.com/compare/netspi-detective-controls-testing-vs-skyhawk-breach-and-attack-simulation)
- [Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation vs SafeBreach Exposure Validation Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/safebreach-exposure-validation-platform-vs-skyhawk-breach-and-attack-simulation)
- [Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation vs FourCore ATTACK](https://cybersectools.com/compare/fourcore-attack-vs-skyhawk-breach-and-attack-simulation)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Filigran OpenAEV alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/filigran-openaev)
- [See all Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/skyhawk-breach-and-attack-simulation)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/filigran-openaev-vs-skyhawk-breach-and-attack-simulation

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/filigran-openaev.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Filigran OpenAEV and Skyhawk Breach and Attack Simulation: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md