# Filigran OpenAEV vs NetSPI Detective Controls Testing: side-by-side comparison (2026) [Filigran OpenAEV](https://cybersectools.com/tools/filigran-openaev) is a commercial [breach & attack simulation](https://cybersectools.com/categories/threat-simulation) solution by [Filigran](https://cybersectools.com/companies/filigran). [NetSPI Detective Controls Testing](https://cybersectools.com/tools/netspi-detective-controls-testing) is a commercial [breach & attack simulation](https://cybersectools.com/categories/threat-simulation) solution by [NetSPI](https://cybersectools.com/companies/netspi). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Side-by-side comparison | | Filigran OpenAEV | NetSPI Detective Controls Testing | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Breach & Attack Simulation | Breach & Attack Simulation | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Hybrid | Cloud | | Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | Filigran | NetSPI | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Filigran OpenAEV | NetSPI Detective Controls Testing | |---|---|---| | MITRE ATT&CK | Yes | Yes | | Open Source | Yes | – | | Red Team | Yes | Yes | | Security Validation | Yes | Yes | | Cyber Threat Intelligence | Yes | – | | Detection Rules | – | Yes | | Ransomware | – | Yes | | Linux | – | Yes | | Azure | – | Yes | | Attack Detection | – | Yes | | macOS | – | Yes | | Attack Paths | – | Yes | ### Core features **Filigran OpenAEV** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **NetSPI Detective Controls Testing** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Filigran OpenAEV** 2 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **NetSPI Detective Controls Testing** 14 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [Filigran OpenAEV](https://cybersectools.com/tools/filigran-openaev) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options. - [NetSPI Detective Controls Testing](https://cybersectools.com/tools/netspi-detective-controls-testing) fits if you want a cloud product. ## Filigran OpenAEV vs NetSPI Detective Controls Testing FAQ Common questions when comparing Filigran OpenAEV vs NetSPI Detective Controls Testing for breach & attack simulation. ### What is the difference between Filigran OpenAEV and NetSPI Detective Controls Testing? **Filigran OpenAEV**: Open-source threat-informed exposure validation platform for attack simulation. Built by Filigran. **NetSPI Detective Controls Testing**: Validates detective security controls through attack simulations and testing. Built by NetSPI. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Filigran OpenAEV and NetSPI Detective Controls Testing? **Filigran OpenAEV** is made by Filigran. **NetSPI Detective Controls Testing** is made by NetSPI. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Filigran OpenAEV a good alternative to NetSPI Detective Controls Testing? Often, yes. Filigran OpenAEV and NetSPI Detective Controls Testing are both Breach & Attack Simulation products, and both cover MITRE ATT&CK, Red Team, Security Validation. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Filigran OpenAEV vs Aether AI](https://cybersectools.com/compare/aether-ai-vs-filigran-openaev) - [Filigran OpenAEV vs Offensys Continuous Purple Teaming Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/filigran-openaev-vs-offensys-continuous-purple-teaming-platform) - [Filigran OpenAEV vs SafeBreach Exposure Validation Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/filigran-openaev-vs-safebreach-exposure-validation-platform) - [NetSPI Detective Controls Testing vs Aether AI](https://cybersectools.com/compare/aether-ai-vs-netspi-detective-controls-testing) - [NetSPI Detective Controls Testing vs Offensys Continuous Purple Teaming Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/netspi-detective-controls-testing-vs-offensys-continuous-purple-teaming-platform) - [NetSPI Detective Controls Testing vs SafeBreach Exposure Validation Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/netspi-detective-controls-testing-vs-safebreach-exposure-validation-platform) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Filigran OpenAEV alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/filigran-openaev) - [See all NetSPI Detective Controls Testing alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/netspi-detective-controls-testing) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/filigran-openaev-vs-netspi-detective-controls-testing For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/filigran-openaev.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Filigran OpenAEV and NetSPI Detective Controls Testing: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md