# EvoMaster vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[EvoMaster](https://cybersectools.com/tools/evomaster) is a free [dynamic application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/dast) solution. [Rapid7 InsightAppSec](https://cybersectools.com/tools/rapid7-insightappsec) is a commercial [dynamic application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/dast) solution by [Rapid7](https://cybersectools.com/companies/rapid7). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Our take

What our shortlists say about the one we picked.

### [Rapid7 InsightAppSec](https://cybersectools.com/tools/rapid7-insightappsec)

Best for: Teams wanting quick setup and a clear dashboard

It is on this list because Attack Replay lets developers check a finding and its fix themselves, which keeps security out of the middle of every ticket. It fits teams of any size that need compliance reports, and the on-premises engine helps if some apps sit on closed networks. It is built on Rapid7's Insight platform, so ask what you gain if you do not use that platform today.

From [Best DAST Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-dast-solutions), Fall 2026.

Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about).

Need the answer fast? [Best DAST Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-dast-solutions) picks PortSwigger Burp Suite DAST, Invicti DAST, Rapid7 InsightAppSec and 4 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | EvoMaster | Rapid7 InsightAppSec |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free | Commercial |
| Category | Dynamic Application Security Testing | Dynamic Application Security Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | On-Premises | Hybrid |
| Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| GitHub stars | 611 | – |
| Last commit | Sep 2025 | – |
| Company | – | Rapid7 |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | EvoMaster | Rapid7 InsightAppSec |
|---|---|---|
| Fuzzing | Yes | – |
| Black Box Testing | – | Yes |
| DAST | – | Yes |
| Web Security | – | Yes |

### Core features

**EvoMaster**

No features listed.

**Rapid7 InsightAppSec**

8 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**EvoMaster**

No integrations listed.

**Rapid7 InsightAppSec**

7 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [EvoMaster](https://cybersectools.com/tools/evomaster) fits if you need to run it on your own servers, you need a free product and you want an open-source product.
- [Rapid7 InsightAppSec](https://cybersectools.com/tools/rapid7-insightappsec) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options.

## EvoMaster vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec FAQ

Common questions when comparing EvoMaster vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec for dynamic application security testing.

### What is the difference between EvoMaster and Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

**EvoMaster**: EvoMaster is an AI-driven tool that automatically generates system-level test cases for web APIs and enterprise applications using evolutionary algorithms and dynamic program analysis.

**Rapid7 InsightAppSec**: DAST product for automated web app and API vulnerability scanning and testing. Built by Rapid7.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes EvoMaster and Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

**EvoMaster** is open-source with 611 GitHub stars. **Rapid7 InsightAppSec** is made by Rapid7. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is EvoMaster a good alternative to Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

Often, yes. EvoMaster and Rapid7 InsightAppSec are both Dynamic Application Security Testing products. Key differences: EvoMaster is Free while Rapid7 InsightAppSec is Commercial, EvoMaster is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [EvoMaster vs Fortra BeSTORM](https://cybersectools.com/compare/evomaster-vs-fortra-bestorm)
- [EvoMaster vs DerScanner Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)](https://cybersectools.com/compare/derscanner-dynamic-application-security-testing-dast-vs-evomaster)
- [EvoMaster vs Greenbone Web App Scanning](https://cybersectools.com/compare/evomaster-vs-greenbone-web-app-scanning)
- [Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Fortra BeSTORM](https://cybersectools.com/compare/fortra-bestorm-vs-rapid7-insightappsec)
- [Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs DerScanner Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)](https://cybersectools.com/compare/derscanner-dynamic-application-security-testing-dast-vs-rapid7-insightappsec)
- [Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Greenbone Web App Scanning](https://cybersectools.com/compare/greenbone-web-app-scanning-vs-rapid7-insightappsec)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all EvoMaster alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/evomaster)
- [See all Rapid7 InsightAppSec alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/rapid7-insightappsec)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/evomaster-vs-rapid7-insightappsec

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/evomaster.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on EvoMaster and Rapid7 InsightAppSec: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md