# Evoke Security vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP): side-by-side comparison (2026) [Evoke Security](https://cybersectools.com/tools/evoke-security) is a commercial [agentic AI security](https://cybersectools.com/categories/agentic-ai-security) solution by [Evoke Security](https://cybersectools.com/companies/evoke-security). [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Hackurity](https://cybersectools.com/companies/hackurity). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. Need the answer fast? [Best Agentic AI Security Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-agentic-ai-security-solutions) picks CrowdStrike Falcon Guardian, Rubrik Agent Cloud, Silverfort AI Agent Security and 5 more. ## Side-by-side comparison | | Evoke Security | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Agentic AI Security | Penetration Testing | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Hybrid | Hybrid | | Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | Evoke Security | Hackurity | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Evoke Security | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) | |---|---|---| | Agentic AI Security | Yes | – | | AI SPM | Yes | – | | Shadow AI | Yes | – | | MCP Security | Yes | – | | LLM Security | Yes | – | | AI Governance | Yes | – | | Inventory | Yes | – | | Attack Paths | Yes | Yes | | GenAI Security | Yes | – | | Non-Human Identity | Yes | – | | AI Pentesting | – | Yes | | Continuous Testing | – | Yes | | Vulnerability Exploitation | – | Yes | | Privilege Escalation | – | Yes | | Post Exploitation | – | Yes | | Supply Chain Security | – | Yes | | Security Validation | – | Yes | | Security Reporting | – | Yes | | Outsourced Security | – | Yes | ### Core features **Evoke Security** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Evoke Security** 9 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)** No integrations listed. ## Evoke Security vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) FAQ Common questions when comparing Evoke Security vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) for agentic AI security. ### What is the difference between Evoke Security and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)? **Evoke Security**: Agentic AI security platform for inventory, posture mgmt, and threat detection. Built by Evoke Security. **Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**: Managed continuous autonomous pentesting using payload-less exploitation and attack paths. Built by Hackurity. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Evoke Security and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)? **Evoke Security** is made by Evoke Security founded in 2025-01-01T00:00:00.000Z. **Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)** is made by Hackurity. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Evoke Security a good alternative to Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)? In part. Evoke Security and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Both cover Attack Paths. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Evoke Security vs Golf MCP Control Plane](https://cybersectools.com/compare/evoke-security-vs-golf-mcp-control-plane) - [Evoke Security vs Oryo](https://cybersectools.com/compare/evoke-security-vs-oryo) - [Evoke Security vs Onyx Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/evoke-security-vs-onyx-platform) - [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Golf MCP Control Plane](https://cybersectools.com/compare/golf-mcp-control-plane-vs-hackurity-art-stack) - [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Oryo](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-oryo) - [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Onyx Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-onyx-platform) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Evoke Security alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/evoke-security) - [See all Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/hackurity-art-stack) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/evoke-security-vs-hackurity-art-stack For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/evoke-security.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Evoke Security and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP): funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md