# Escape GraphQL Security Testing vs Fortra BeSTORM: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Escape GraphQL Security Testing](https://cybersectools.com/tools/escape-graphql-security-testing) is a commercial [dynamic application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/dast) solution by [Escape Technologies](https://cybersectools.com/companies/escape-technologies). [Fortra BeSTORM](https://cybersectools.com/tools/fortra-bestorm) is a commercial [dynamic application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/dast) solution by [Fortra](https://cybersectools.com/companies/fortra). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

Need the answer fast? [Best DAST Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-dast-solutions) picks PortSwigger Burp Suite DAST, Invicti DAST, Rapid7 InsightAppSec and 4 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Escape GraphQL Security Testing | Fortra BeSTORM |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | Dynamic Application Security Testing | Dynamic Application Security Testing |
| Verified | No | Verified |
| Deployment type | Cloud | Hybrid |
| Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | Escape Technologies | Fortra |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Escape GraphQL Security Testing | Fortra BeSTORM |
|---|---|---|
| CI/CD | Yes | – |
| DAST | Yes | Yes |
| Fuzzing | – | Yes |
| Black Box Testing | – | Yes |
| Protocol Analysis | – | Yes |
| Critical Infrastructure | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Escape GraphQL Security Testing**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Fortra BeSTORM**

- Black box fuzzing without source code access
- Automated malformed input generation and injection
- Protocol and API security testing
- Vulnerability detection including buffer overflows and format string errors
- Support for a wide range of protocols and application interfaces
- Pre-release application security validation

### Integrations

**Escape GraphQL Security Testing**

7 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Fortra BeSTORM**

No integrations listed.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Escape GraphQL Security Testing](https://cybersectools.com/tools/escape-graphql-security-testing) fits if you want a cloud product and you are a small business.
- [Fortra BeSTORM](https://cybersectools.com/tools/fortra-bestorm) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options.

## Escape GraphQL Security Testing vs Fortra BeSTORM FAQ

Common questions when comparing Escape GraphQL Security Testing vs Fortra BeSTORM for dynamic application security testing.

### What is the difference between Escape GraphQL Security Testing and Fortra BeSTORM?

**Escape GraphQL Security Testing**: GraphQL-native DAST tool for security testing GraphQL applications. Built by Escape Technologies.

**Fortra BeSTORM**: Black box fuzzer and DAST product for application security testing. Built by Fortra. Core capabilities include Black box fuzzing without source code access, Automated malformed input generation and injection, Protocol and API security testing.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Escape GraphQL Security Testing and Fortra BeSTORM?

**Escape GraphQL Security Testing** is made by Escape Technologies. **Fortra BeSTORM** is made by Fortra. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Escape GraphQL Security Testing a good alternative to Fortra BeSTORM?

Often, yes. Escape GraphQL Security Testing and Fortra BeSTORM are both Dynamic Application Security Testing products, and both cover DAST. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Escape GraphQL Security Testing vs Tenable One Web App Scanning](https://cybersectools.com/compare/escape-graphql-security-testing-vs-tenable-web-app-scanning)
- [Escape GraphQL Security Testing vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec](https://cybersectools.com/compare/escape-graphql-security-testing-vs-rapid7-insightappsec)
- [Escape GraphQL Security Testing vs ImmuniWeb® Neuron](https://cybersectools.com/compare/escape-graphql-security-testing-vs-immuniwebr-neuron)
- [Fortra BeSTORM vs Tenable One Web App Scanning](https://cybersectools.com/compare/fortra-bestorm-vs-tenable-web-app-scanning)
- [Fortra BeSTORM vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec](https://cybersectools.com/compare/fortra-bestorm-vs-rapid7-insightappsec)
- [Fortra BeSTORM vs ImmuniWeb® Neuron](https://cybersectools.com/compare/fortra-bestorm-vs-immuniwebr-neuron)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Escape GraphQL Security Testing alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/escape-graphql-security-testing)
- [See all Fortra BeSTORM alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/fortra-bestorm)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/escape-graphql-security-testing-vs-fortra-bestorm

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/escape-graphql-security-testing.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Escape GraphQL Security Testing and Fortra BeSTORM: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md