# Cyver Pentest Management Platform vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP): side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Cyver Pentest Management Platform](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cyver-pentest-management-platform) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Cyver](https://cybersectools.com/companies/cyver). [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Hackurity](https://cybersectools.com/companies/hackurity). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Cyver Pentest Management Platform | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | Penetration Testing | Penetration Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Cloud | Hybrid |
| Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | Cyver | Hackurity |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Cyver Pentest Management Platform | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Red Team | Yes | – |
| AI Pentesting | – | Yes |
| Attack Paths | – | Yes |
| Continuous Testing | – | Yes |
| Vulnerability Exploitation | – | Yes |
| Privilege Escalation | – | Yes |
| Post Exploitation | – | Yes |
| Supply Chain Security | – | Yes |
| Security Validation | – | Yes |
| Security Reporting | – | Yes |
| Outsourced Security | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Cyver Pentest Management Platform**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**Cyver Pentest Management Platform**

43 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**

No integrations listed.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Cyver Pentest Management Platform](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cyver-pentest-management-platform) fits if you want a cloud product and you are a small business.
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options.

## Cyver Pentest Management Platform vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) FAQ

Common questions when comparing Cyver Pentest Management Platform vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) for penetration testing.

### What is the difference between Cyver Pentest Management Platform and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)?

**Cyver Pentest Management Platform**: Pentest management platform for reporting, project mgmt & client collaboration, built by Cyver.

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**: Managed continuous autonomous pentesting using payload-less exploitation and attack paths, built by Hackurity.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Cyver Pentest Management Platform and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)?

**Cyver Pentest Management Platform** is made by Cyver. **Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)** is made by Hackurity. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Cyver Pentest Management Platform a good alternative to Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)?

Often, yes. Cyver Pentest Management Platform and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) are both Penetration Testing products. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Cyver Pentest Management Platform vs Nebula by BreachLine Labs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/breachline-nebula-vs-cyver-pentest-management-platform)
- [Cyver Pentest Management Platform vs Plainsea Agentic Penetration Testing Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cyver-pentest-management-platform-vs-plainsea-agentic-penetration-testing-platform)
- [Cyver Pentest Management Platform vs KinoSec Zeus](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cyver-pentest-management-platform-vs-kinosec-zeus)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Nebula by BreachLine Labs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/breachline-nebula-vs-hackurity-art-stack)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Plainsea Agentic Penetration Testing Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-plainsea-agentic-penetration-testing-platform)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs KinoSec Zeus](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-kinosec-zeus)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Cyver Pentest Management Platform alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/cyver-pentest-management-platform)
- [See all Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/hackurity-art-stack)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/cyver-pentest-management-platform-vs-hackurity-art-stack

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/cyver-pentest-management-platform.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Cyver Pentest Management Platform and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP): funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md
