# CyCraft XCockpit EASM vs Guardz External Footprint: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[CyCraft XCockpit EASM](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cycraft-xcockpit-easm) is a commercial [external attack surface management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/external-asm) solution by [CyCraft Technology](https://cybersectools.com/companies/cycraft-technology). [Guardz External Footprint](https://cybersectools.com/tools/guardz-external-footprint) is a commercial [external attack surface management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/external-asm) solution by [Guardz](https://cybersectools.com/companies/guardz). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

Need the answer fast? [Best Attack Surface Management Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-attack-surface-solutions) picks Palo Alto Networks Cortex Xpanse, Microsoft Defender EASM, Mandiant Attack Surface Management and 4 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | CyCraft XCockpit EASM | Guardz External Footprint |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | External Attack Surface Management | External Attack Surface Management |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Cloud | Cloud |
| Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | CyCraft Technology | Guardz |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | CyCraft XCockpit EASM | Guardz External Footprint |
|---|---|---|
| Dark Web Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| DNS Security | – | Yes |
| SSL | – | Yes |
| TLS | – | Yes |
| Multi Tenancy | – | Yes |

### Core features

**CyCraft XCockpit EASM**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Guardz External Footprint**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**CyCraft XCockpit EASM**

No integrations listed.

**Guardz External Footprint**

2 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Guardz External Footprint](https://cybersectools.com/tools/guardz-external-footprint) fits if you are a small business.

## CyCraft XCockpit EASM vs Guardz External Footprint FAQ

Common questions when comparing CyCraft XCockpit EASM vs Guardz External Footprint for external attack surface management.

### What is the difference between CyCraft XCockpit EASM and Guardz External Footprint?

**CyCraft XCockpit EASM**: External attack surface management platform with AI-powered risk assessment, built by CyCraft Technology.

**Guardz External Footprint**: External attack surface monitoring with dark web intelligence and scanning, built by Guardz.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes CyCraft XCockpit EASM and Guardz External Footprint?

**CyCraft XCockpit EASM** is made by CyCraft Technology. **Guardz External Footprint** is made by Guardz. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is CyCraft XCockpit EASM a good alternative to Guardz External Footprint?

Often, yes. CyCraft XCockpit EASM and Guardz External Footprint are both External Attack Surface Management products, and both cover Dark Web Monitoring. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [CyCraft XCockpit EASM vs ThreatDefence Integrated ASM](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cycraft-xcockpit-easm-vs-threatdefence-integrated-asm)
- [CyCraft XCockpit EASM vs Attack Surface Scan](https://cybersectools.com/compare/attack-surface-scan-vs-cycraft-xcockpit-easm)
- [CyCraft XCockpit EASM vs SOC Radar Attack Surface Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cycraft-xcockpit-easm-vs-soc-radar-attack-surface-management)
- [Guardz External Footprint vs ThreatDefence Integrated ASM](https://cybersectools.com/compare/guardz-external-footprint-vs-threatdefence-integrated-asm)
- [Guardz External Footprint vs Attack Surface Scan](https://cybersectools.com/compare/attack-surface-scan-vs-guardz-external-footprint)
- [Guardz External Footprint vs SOC Radar Attack Surface Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/guardz-external-footprint-vs-soc-radar-attack-surface-management)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all CyCraft XCockpit EASM alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/cycraft-xcockpit-easm)
- [See all Guardz External Footprint alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/guardz-external-footprint)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/cycraft-xcockpit-easm-vs-guardz-external-footprint

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/cycraft-xcockpit-easm.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on CyCraft XCockpit EASM and Guardz External Footprint: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md