# CyCognito Active Security Testing vs OpenText Fortify SAST: side-by-side comparison (2026) [CyCognito Active Security Testing](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cycognito-active-security-testing) is a commercial [security scanning](https://cybersectools.com/categories/security-scanning) solution by [CyCognito](https://cybersectools.com/companies/cycognito). [OpenText Fortify SAST](https://cybersectools.com/tools/opentext-fortify-sast) is a commercial [static application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/sast) solution by [OpenText Cybersecurity](https://cybersectools.com/companies/opentext-cybersecurity). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Our take What our shortlists say about the one we picked. ### [OpenText Fortify SAST](https://cybersectools.com/tools/opentext-fortify-sast) Best for: Large companies wanting cloud or on-premises scans with compliance reports It earns a place because it runs as SaaS, private hosted or fully on premises, and its policies report against OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS and ISO 27001, which suits regulated teams that cannot send code to a shared cloud. Decide who owns the scan policies, since blocking builds only works when someone sets what counts as a blocker. From [Best SAST Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-sast-solutions), Fall 2026. Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about). ## Side-by-side comparison | | CyCognito Active Security Testing | OpenText Fortify SAST | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Security Scanning | Static Application Security Testing | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Cloud | Hybrid | | Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | CyCognito | OpenText Cybersecurity | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | CyCognito Active Security Testing | OpenText Fortify SAST | |---|---|---| | Attack Paths | Yes | – | | DAST | Yes | – | | CI/CD | – | Yes | | DevSecOps | – | Yes | | IDE | – | Yes | | SAST | – | Yes | | Source Code Analysis | – | Yes | ### Core features **CyCognito Active Security Testing** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **OpenText Fortify SAST** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **CyCognito Active Security Testing** No integrations listed. **OpenText Fortify SAST** 12 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [CyCognito Active Security Testing](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cycognito-active-security-testing) fits if you want a cloud product and you are a small business. - [OpenText Fortify SAST](https://cybersectools.com/tools/opentext-fortify-sast) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options. ## CyCognito Active Security Testing vs OpenText Fortify SAST FAQ Common questions when comparing CyCognito Active Security Testing vs OpenText Fortify SAST for security scanning. ### What is the difference between CyCognito Active Security Testing and OpenText Fortify SAST? **CyCognito Active Security Testing**: Automated active security testing platform for external attack surfaces, built by CyCognito. **OpenText Fortify SAST**: Static code analysis that finds security flaws in source code early, built by OpenText Cybersecurity. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes CyCognito Active Security Testing and OpenText Fortify SAST? **CyCognito Active Security Testing** is made by CyCognito. **OpenText Fortify SAST** is made by OpenText Cybersecurity. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is CyCognito Active Security Testing a good alternative to OpenText Fortify SAST? In part. CyCognito Active Security Testing and OpenText Fortify SAST are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [CyCognito Active Security Testing vs RoboShadow OWASP ZAP Vulnerability Scanner](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cycognito-active-security-testing-vs-roboshadow-owasp-zap-vulnerability-scanner) - [CyCognito Active Security Testing vs Intruder XSS Scanner](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cycognito-active-security-testing-vs-intruder-xss-scanner) - [CyCognito Active Security Testing vs Jsmon 2.0](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cycognito-active-security-testing-vs-jsmon-20) - [OpenText Fortify SAST vs RoboShadow OWASP ZAP Vulnerability Scanner](https://cybersectools.com/compare/opentext-fortify-sast-vs-roboshadow-owasp-zap-vulnerability-scanner) - [OpenText Fortify SAST vs Intruder XSS Scanner](https://cybersectools.com/compare/intruder-xss-scanner-vs-opentext-fortify-sast) - [OpenText Fortify SAST vs Jsmon 2.0](https://cybersectools.com/compare/jsmon-20-vs-opentext-fortify-sast) ## Alternatives to each - [See all CyCognito Active Security Testing alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/cycognito-active-security-testing) - [See all OpenText Fortify SAST alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/opentext-fortify-sast) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/cycognito-active-security-testing-vs-opentext-fortify-sast For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/cycognito-active-security-testing.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on CyCognito Active Security Testing and OpenText Fortify SAST: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md