# CyberSmart Active Protect vs Labrador Server Care: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[CyberSmart Active Protect](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cybersmart-active-protect) is a commercial [vulnerability assessment](https://cybersectools.com/categories/vulnerability-assessment) solution by [CyberSmart](https://cybersectools.com/companies/cybersmart). [Labrador Server Care](https://cybersectools.com/tools/labrador-server-care) is a commercial [vulnerability assessment](https://cybersectools.com/categories/vulnerability-assessment) solution by [Labrador Labs](https://cybersectools.com/companies/labrador-labs). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | CyberSmart Active Protect | Labrador Server Care |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | Vulnerability Assessment | Vulnerability Assessment |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | On-Premises | On-Premises |
| Company size fit | Startup, SMB | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | CyberSmart | Labrador Labs |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | CyberSmart Active Protect | Labrador Server Care |
|---|---|---|
| Policy | Yes | – |
| BYOD | Yes | – |
| Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Vulnerability | – | Yes |
| Open Source | – | Yes |
| SBOM | – | Yes |
| SCA | – | Yes |
| Linux | – | Yes |
| Unix | – | Yes |
| Server | – | Yes |
| Patch Management | – | Yes |
| License Compliance | – | Yes |

### Core features

**CyberSmart Active Protect**

9 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Labrador Server Care**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**CyberSmart Active Protect**

No integrations listed.

**Labrador Server Care**

1 integration listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [CyberSmart Active Protect](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cybersmart-active-protect) fits if you are a startup.
- [Labrador Server Care](https://cybersectools.com/tools/labrador-server-care) fits if you are a mid-market company or an enterprise.

## CyberSmart Active Protect vs Labrador Server Care FAQ

Common questions when comparing CyberSmart Active Protect vs Labrador Server Care for vulnerability assessment.

### What is the difference between CyberSmart Active Protect and Labrador Server Care?

**CyberSmart Active Protect**: Desktop app for vuln scanning, policy mgmt & security awareness training, built by CyberSmart.

**Labrador Server Care**: Periodically scans servers for open source SW vulnerabilities and license issues, built by Labrador Labs.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes CyberSmart Active Protect and Labrador Server Care?

**CyberSmart Active Protect** is made by CyberSmart. **Labrador Server Care** is made by Labrador Labs. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is CyberSmart Active Protect a good alternative to Labrador Server Care?

Often, yes. CyberSmart Active Protect and Labrador Server Care are both Vulnerability Assessment products, and both cover Windows. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [CyberSmart Active Protect vs Lyrie Remedy — AI Auto-Fix for Vulnerabilities](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cybersmart-active-protect-vs-lyrie-remedy-ai-auto-fix-for-vulnerabilities)
- [CyberSmart Active Protect vs Action1 Windows Patch Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/action1-windows-patch-management-vs-cybersmart-active-protect)
- [CyberSmart Active Protect vs Qingteng Wanxiang (Host Adaptive Security Platform)](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cybersmart-active-protect-vs-qingteng-wanxiang-host-adaptive-security-platform)
- [Labrador Server Care vs Lyrie Remedy — AI Auto-Fix for Vulnerabilities](https://cybersectools.com/compare/labrador-server-care-vs-lyrie-remedy-ai-auto-fix-for-vulnerabilities)
- [Labrador Server Care vs Action1 Windows Patch Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/action1-windows-patch-management-vs-labrador-server-care)
- [Labrador Server Care vs Qingteng Wanxiang (Host Adaptive Security Platform)](https://cybersectools.com/compare/labrador-server-care-vs-qingteng-wanxiang-host-adaptive-security-platform)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all CyberSmart Active Protect alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/cybersmart-active-protect)
- [See all Labrador Server Care alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/labrador-server-care)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/cybersmart-active-protect-vs-labrador-server-care

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/cybersmart-active-protect.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on CyberSmart Active Protect and Labrador Server Care: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md