# CyberHive Connect vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access: side-by-side comparison (2026) [CyberHive Connect](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cyberhive-connect) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [CyberHive](https://cybersectools.com/companies/cyberhive). [ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [ThreatLocker](https://cybersectools.com/companies/threatlocker). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. Need the answer fast? [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions) picks Zscaler Private Access (ZPA), Netskope One Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access ZTNA 2.0 and 4 more. ## Side-by-side comparison | | CyberHive Connect | ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Zero Trust Network Access | Zero Trust Network Access | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Cloud | Cloud | | Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | CyberHive | ThreatLocker | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | CyberHive Connect | ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access | |---|---|---| | ZTNA | Yes | Yes | | Quantum Safe | Yes | – | | Remote Access | Yes | Yes | | Microsoft 365 | Yes | – | | Zero Trust Architecture | – | Yes | | Lateral Movement | – | Yes | | Authorization | – | Yes | | Network Protection | – | Yes | | Hybrid Work | – | Yes | | RDP | – | Yes | | Policy | – | Yes | | Least Privilege | – | Yes | ### Core features **CyberHive Connect** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access** 7 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **CyberHive Connect** 3 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access** No integrations listed. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access) fits if you are a small business. ## CyberHive Connect vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access FAQ Common questions when comparing CyberHive Connect vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access for zero trust network access. ### What is the difference between CyberHive Connect and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access? **CyberHive Connect**: Zero-trust, post-quantum secure connectivity for mission-critical environments. Built by CyberHive. **ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access**: ZTNA that brokers access from authorized users/devices to internal resources, no VPN. Built by ThreatLocker. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes CyberHive Connect and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access? **CyberHive Connect** is made by CyberHive. **ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access** is made by ThreatLocker. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is CyberHive Connect a good alternative to ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access? Often, yes. CyberHive Connect and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access are both Zero Trust Network Access products, and both cover ZTNA, Remote Access. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [CyberHive Connect vs Threatmatic Zero Trust Edge](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cyberhive-connect-vs-threatmatic-zero-trust-edge) - [CyberHive Connect vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cyberhive-connect-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access) - [CyberHive Connect vs Alkira Zero Trust Network Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/alkira-ztna-vs-cyberhive-connect) - [ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access vs Threatmatic Zero Trust Edge](https://cybersectools.com/compare/threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access-vs-threatmatic-zero-trust-edge) - [ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/quantlayer-secure-remote-access-vs-threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access) - [ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access vs Alkira Zero Trust Network Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/alkira-ztna-vs-threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access) ## Alternatives to each - [See all CyberHive Connect alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/cyberhive-connect) - [See all ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/cyberhive-connect-vs-threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/cyberhive-connect.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on CyberHive Connect and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md