# CyberHive Connect vs Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine: side-by-side comparison (2026) [CyberHive Connect](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cyberhive-connect) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [CyberHive](https://cybersectools.com/companies/cyberhive). [Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine](https://cybersectools.com/tools/primary-zero-trust-policy-engine) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [Primary](https://cybersectools.com/companies/primary). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. Need the answer fast? [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions) picks Zscaler Private Access (ZPA), Netskope One Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access ZTNA 2.0 and 4 more. ## Side-by-side comparison | | CyberHive Connect | Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Zero Trust Network Access | Zero Trust Network Access | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Cloud | Hybrid | | Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | CyberHive | Primary | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | CyberHive Connect | Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine | |---|---|---| | ZTNA | Yes | Yes | | Quantum Safe | Yes | – | | Remote Access | Yes | – | | Microsoft 365 | Yes | – | | Zero Trust Architecture | – | Yes | | RBAC | – | Yes | | MFA | – | Yes | | Encryption | – | Yes | | SSO | – | Yes | | Least Privilege | – | Yes | | Multi Tenancy | – | Yes | ### Core features **CyberHive Connect** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **CyberHive Connect** 3 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine** 10 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [CyberHive Connect](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cyberhive-connect) fits if you want a cloud product. - [Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine](https://cybersectools.com/tools/primary-zero-trust-policy-engine) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options. ## CyberHive Connect vs Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine FAQ Common questions when comparing CyberHive Connect vs Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine for zero trust network access. ### What is the difference between CyberHive Connect and Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine? **CyberHive Connect**: Zero-trust, post-quantum secure connectivity for mission-critical environments. Built by CyberHive. **Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine**: Zero Trust policy engine for enterprise user, device, data & network security. Built by Primary. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes CyberHive Connect and Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine? **CyberHive Connect** is made by CyberHive. **Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine** is made by Primary. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is CyberHive Connect a good alternative to Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine? Often, yes. CyberHive Connect and Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine are both Zero Trust Network Access products, and both cover ZTNA. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [CyberHive Connect vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cyberhive-connect-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access) - [CyberHive Connect vs Agilicus](https://cybersectools.com/compare/agilicus-vs-cyberhive-connect) - [CyberHive Connect vs GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cyberhive-connect-vs-goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture) - [Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/primary-zero-trust-policy-engine-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access) - [Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine vs Agilicus](https://cybersectools.com/compare/agilicus-vs-primary-zero-trust-policy-engine) - [Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine vs GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture](https://cybersectools.com/compare/goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture-vs-primary-zero-trust-policy-engine) ## Alternatives to each - [See all CyberHive Connect alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/cyberhive-connect) - [See all Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/primary-zero-trust-policy-engine) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/cyberhive-connect-vs-primary-zero-trust-policy-engine For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/cyberhive-connect.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on CyberHive Connect and Primary Zero Trust Policy Engine: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md