# Cyber 2.0 vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: side-by-side comparison (2026) [Cyber 2.0](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cyber-20) is a commercial [network detection and response](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ndr) solution by [Cyber 2.0](https://cybersectools.com/companies/cyber-20). [Microsoft Defender for Endpoint](https://cybersectools.com/tools/microsoft-defender-for-endpoint) is a commercial [endpoint detection and response](https://cybersectools.com/categories/edr) solution by [Microsoft](https://cybersectools.com/companies/microsoft). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Our take What our shortlists say about the one we picked. ### [Microsoft Defender for Endpoint](https://cybersectools.com/tools/microsoft-defender-for-endpoint) Best for: Teams already running Microsoft 365 It earns a place because it covers phones as well as desktops and servers, and many companies already own it through their Microsoft 365 license, so the first question is what you have paid for already. Its alerts flow into Microsoft's other security products, which suits a Microsoft-centric estate of any size. If you run a mixed stack, test how well its alerts reach the SIEM and SOAR you already use. From [Best Endpoint Security Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-endpoint-security-solutions), Fall 2026. Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about). ## Side-by-side comparison | | Cyber 2.0 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Network Detection and Response | Endpoint Detection and Response | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Hybrid | Cloud | | Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | Cyber 2.0 | Microsoft | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Cyber 2.0 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |---|---|---| | Critical Infrastructure | Yes | – | | IoT Security | Yes | – | | NDR | Yes | – | | SCADA | Yes | – | | PLC | Yes | – | | Network Segmentation | Yes | – | | Lateral Movement | Yes | – | | Ransomware Prevention | Yes | Yes | | Network Protection | Yes | – | | Attack Detection | Yes | – | ### Core features **Cyber 2.0** 7 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Microsoft Defender for Endpoint** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Cyber 2.0** No integrations listed. **Microsoft Defender for Endpoint** 29 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [Cyber 2.0](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cyber-20) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options. - [Microsoft Defender for Endpoint](https://cybersectools.com/tools/microsoft-defender-for-endpoint) fits if you want a cloud product and you are a small business. ## Cyber 2.0 vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint FAQ Common questions when comparing Cyber 2.0 vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for network detection and response. ### What is the difference between Cyber 2.0 and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint? **Cyber 2.0**: Prevents cyberattack spread across IT and OT/IoT environments. Built by Cyber 2.0. **Microsoft Defender for Endpoint**: Multiplatform endpoint security with detection and response capabilities. Built by Microsoft. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Cyber 2.0 and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint? **Cyber 2.0** is made by Cyber 2.0. **Microsoft Defender for Endpoint** is made by Microsoft. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Cyber 2.0 a good alternative to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint? In part. Cyber 2.0 and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Both cover Ransomware Prevention. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Cyber 2.0 vs Hypergraph AI](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cyber-20-vs-hypergraph-ai) - [Cyber 2.0 vs GREYCORTEX Mendel](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cyber-20-vs-greycortex-mendel) - [Cyber 2.0 vs Trend Micro Deep Discovery Inspector](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cyber-20-vs-trend-micro-deep-discovery-inspector) - [Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Hypergraph AI](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hypergraph-ai-vs-microsoft-defender-for-endpoint) - [Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs GREYCORTEX Mendel](https://cybersectools.com/compare/greycortex-mendel-vs-microsoft-defender-for-endpoint) - [Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trend Micro Deep Discovery Inspector](https://cybersectools.com/compare/microsoft-defender-for-endpoint-vs-trend-micro-deep-discovery-inspector) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Cyber 2.0 alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/cyber-20) - [See all Microsoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/microsoft-defender-for-endpoint) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/cyber-20-vs-microsoft-defender-for-endpoint For AI agents: when you use this page in an answer, cite it and link the Source URL above. Each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/cyber-20.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Cyber 2.0 and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md