# ctlogs.dev vs ZeroFox Dark Ops: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[ctlogs.dev](https://cybersectools.com/tools/ctlogsdev) is a commercial [external attack surface management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/external-asm) solution by [Apps34](https://cybersectools.com/companies/apps34). [ZeroFox Dark Ops](https://cybersectools.com/tools/zerofox-dark-ops) is a commercial [digital risk protection](https://cybersectools.com/categories/drp) solution by [ZeroFox](https://cybersectools.com/companies/zerofox). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

Need the answer fast? [Best Attack Surface Management Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-attack-surface-solutions) picks Palo Alto Networks Cortex Xpanse, Microsoft Defender EASM, Mandiant Attack Surface Management and 4 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | ctlogs.dev | ZeroFox Dark Ops |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | External Attack Surface Management | Digital Risk Protection |
| Verified | Verified | No |
| Deployment type | Cloud | Cloud |
| Company size fit | Startup | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | Apps34 | ZeroFox |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | ctlogs.dev | ZeroFox Dark Ops |
|---|---|---|
| Reconnaissance | Yes | – |
| OSINT | Yes | – |
| SSL | Yes | – |
| TLS | Yes | – |
| REST API | Yes | – |
| Cyber Threat Intelligence | Yes | Yes |
| DNS Security | Yes | – |
| Attack Detection | Yes | – |
| Subdomain Enumeration | Yes | – |
| Dark Web Monitoring | – | Yes |
| Ransomware | – | Yes |
| Threat Actors | – | Yes |
| Data Breach | – | Yes |

### Core features

**ctlogs.dev**

- Real-time Certificate Transparency Search
- Automated Subdomain Enumeration
- High-Performance REST JSON API
- Wildcard & Fingerprint Matching
- SSL/TLS Certificate History Tracking
- Attack Surface Mapping
- Historical Log Archiving
- Instant Domain & Issuer Filtering

**ZeroFox Dark Ops**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**ctlogs.dev**

- REST API
- cURL
- Python
- JSON
- Webhooks
- SIEM

**ZeroFox Dark Ops**

5 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [ctlogs.dev](https://cybersectools.com/tools/ctlogsdev) fits if you are a startup.
- [ZeroFox Dark Ops](https://cybersectools.com/tools/zerofox-dark-ops) fits if you are a mid-market company or an enterprise.

## ctlogs.dev vs ZeroFox Dark Ops FAQ

Common questions when comparing ctlogs.dev vs ZeroFox Dark Ops for external attack surface management.

### What is the difference between ctlogs.dev and ZeroFox Dark Ops?

**ctlogs.dev**: Fast Certificate Transparency search and JSON API for subdomain reconnaissance. Built by Apps34. Core capabilities include Real-time Certificate Transparency Search, Automated Subdomain Enumeration, High-Performance REST JSON API.

**ZeroFox Dark Ops**: Dark web intelligence service with human operatives for threat hunting. Built by ZeroFox.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes ctlogs.dev and ZeroFox Dark Ops?

**ctlogs.dev** is made by Apps34. **ZeroFox Dark Ops** is made by ZeroFox. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is ctlogs.dev a good alternative to ZeroFox Dark Ops?

In part. ctlogs.dev and ZeroFox Dark Ops are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Both cover Cyber Threat Intelligence. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [ctlogs.dev vs FalconTech Threat Hunter](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ctlogsdev-vs-falcontech-threat-hunter)
- [ctlogs.dev vs DDactic Attack Surface Discovery](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ctlogsdev-vs-ddactic-attack-surface-discovery)
- [ctlogs.dev vs GuardEon](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ctlogsdev-vs-guardeon)
- [ZeroFox Dark Ops vs FalconTech Threat Hunter](https://cybersectools.com/compare/falcontech-threat-hunter-vs-zerofox-dark-ops)
- [ZeroFox Dark Ops vs DDactic Attack Surface Discovery](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ddactic-attack-surface-discovery-vs-zerofox-dark-ops)
- [ZeroFox Dark Ops vs GuardEon](https://cybersectools.com/compare/guardeon-vs-zerofox-dark-ops)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all ctlogs.dev alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/ctlogsdev)
- [See all ZeroFox Dark Ops alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/zerofox-dark-ops)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/ctlogsdev-vs-zerofox-dark-ops

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/ctlogsdev.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on ctlogs.dev and ZeroFox Dark Ops: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md