# ctlogs.dev vs CyberXTron ShadowSpot: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[ctlogs.dev](https://cybersectools.com/tools/ctlogsdev) is a commercial [external attack surface management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/external-asm) solution by [Apps34](https://cybersectools.com/companies/apps34). [CyberXTron ShadowSpot](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cyberxtron-shadowspot) is a commercial [external attack surface management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/external-asm) solution by [CyberXTron](https://cybersectools.com/companies/cyberxtron). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

Need the answer fast? [Best Attack Surface Management Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-attack-surface-solutions) picks Palo Alto Networks Cortex Xpanse, Microsoft Defender EASM, Mandiant Attack Surface Management and 4 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | ctlogs.dev | CyberXTron ShadowSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | External Attack Surface Management | External Attack Surface Management |
| Verified | Verified | No |
| Deployment type | Cloud | Cloud |
| Company size fit | Startup | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | Apps34 | CyberXTron |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | ctlogs.dev | CyberXTron ShadowSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Reconnaissance | Yes | – |
| OSINT | Yes | – |
| SSL | Yes | – |
| TLS | Yes | – |
| REST API | Yes | – |
| Cyber Threat Intelligence | Yes | – |
| DNS Security | Yes | – |
| Attack Detection | Yes | – |
| Subdomain Enumeration | Yes | – |
| Misconfiguration | – | Yes |

### Core features

**ctlogs.dev**

- Real-time Certificate Transparency Search
- Automated Subdomain Enumeration
- High-Performance REST JSON API
- Wildcard & Fingerprint Matching
- SSL/TLS Certificate History Tracking
- Attack Surface Mapping
- Historical Log Archiving
- Instant Domain & Issuer Filtering

**CyberXTron ShadowSpot**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**ctlogs.dev**

- REST API
- cURL
- Python
- JSON
- Webhooks
- SIEM

**CyberXTron ShadowSpot**

No integrations listed.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [ctlogs.dev](https://cybersectools.com/tools/ctlogsdev) fits if you are a startup.
- [CyberXTron ShadowSpot](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cyberxtron-shadowspot) fits if you are a small business or a mid-market company or an enterprise.

## ctlogs.dev vs CyberXTron ShadowSpot FAQ

Common questions when comparing ctlogs.dev vs CyberXTron ShadowSpot for external attack surface management.

### What is the difference between ctlogs.dev and CyberXTron ShadowSpot?

**ctlogs.dev**: Fast Certificate Transparency search and JSON API for subdomain reconnaissance. Built by Apps34. Core capabilities include Real-time Certificate Transparency Search, Automated Subdomain Enumeration, High-Performance REST JSON API.

**CyberXTron ShadowSpot**: External attack surface management platform for asset discovery and risk detection. Built by CyberXTron.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes ctlogs.dev and CyberXTron ShadowSpot?

**ctlogs.dev** is made by Apps34. **CyberXTron ShadowSpot** is made by CyberXTron. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is ctlogs.dev a good alternative to CyberXTron ShadowSpot?

Often, yes. ctlogs.dev and CyberXTron ShadowSpot are both External Attack Surface Management products. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [ctlogs.dev vs MGM Security Partners recon me](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ctlogsdev-vs-mgm-security-partners-recon-me)
- [ctlogs.dev vs ThreatDefence Integrated ASM](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ctlogsdev-vs-threatdefence-integrated-asm)
- [ctlogs.dev vs DDactic Attack Surface Discovery](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ctlogsdev-vs-ddactic-attack-surface-discovery)
- [CyberXTron ShadowSpot vs MGM Security Partners recon me](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cyberxtron-shadowspot-vs-mgm-security-partners-recon-me)
- [CyberXTron ShadowSpot vs ThreatDefence Integrated ASM](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cyberxtron-shadowspot-vs-threatdefence-integrated-asm)
- [CyberXTron ShadowSpot vs DDactic Attack Surface Discovery](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cyberxtron-shadowspot-vs-ddactic-attack-surface-discovery)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all ctlogs.dev alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/ctlogsdev)
- [See all CyberXTron ShadowSpot alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/cyberxtron-shadowspot)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/ctlogsdev-vs-cyberxtron-shadowspot

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/ctlogsdev.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on ctlogs.dev and CyberXTron ShadowSpot: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md