# Core Security Outflank Security Tooling vs GadgetToJScript: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Core Security Outflank Security Tooling](https://cybersectools.com/tools/core-security-outflank-security-tooling) is a commercial [Red-Team & adversary emulation](https://cybersectools.com/categories/offensive-security) solution by [Core Security](https://cybersectools.com/companies/core-security). [GadgetToJScript](https://cybersectools.com/tools/gadgettojscript) is a free [Red-Team & adversary emulation](https://cybersectools.com/categories/offensive-security) solution. Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Core Security Outflank Security Tooling | GadgetToJScript |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Free |
| Category | Red-Team & Adversary Emulation | Red-Team & Adversary Emulation |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | On-Premises | On-Premises |
| Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| GitHub stars | – | 1,088 |
| Last commit | – | Jul 2021 |
| Company | Core Security | – |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Core Security Outflank Security Tooling | GadgetToJScript |
|---|---|---|
| Red Team | Yes | – |
| Evasion | Yes | – |
| C2 | Yes | – |
| Lateral Movement | Yes | – |
| Payload Generation | Yes | Yes |
| Post Exploitation | Yes | – |
| .NET | – | Yes |
| Code Injection | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Core Security Outflank Security Tooling**

8 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**GadgetToJScript**

No features listed.

### Integrations

**Core Security Outflank Security Tooling**

4 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**GadgetToJScript**

No integrations listed.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [GadgetToJScript](https://cybersectools.com/tools/gadgettojscript) fits if you need a free product and you want an open-source product.

## Core Security Outflank Security Tooling vs GadgetToJScript FAQ

Common questions when comparing Core Security Outflank Security Tooling vs GadgetToJScript for Red-Team & adversary emulation.

### What is the difference between Core Security Outflank Security Tooling and GadgetToJScript?

**Core Security Outflank Security Tooling**: Red team toolkit for EDR evasion, initial access, and post-exploitation, built by Core Security.

**GadgetToJScript**: A tool that generates .NET serialized gadgets for triggering assembly load and execution through BinaryFormatter deserialization in JavaScript, VBScript, and VBA scripts.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Core Security Outflank Security Tooling and GadgetToJScript?

**Core Security Outflank Security Tooling** is made by Core Security. **GadgetToJScript** is open-source with 1,088 GitHub stars. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Core Security Outflank Security Tooling a good alternative to GadgetToJScript?

Often, yes. Core Security Outflank Security Tooling and GadgetToJScript are both Red-Team & Adversary Emulation products, and both cover Payload Generation. Key differences: Core Security Outflank Security Tooling is Commercial while GadgetToJScript is Free, GadgetToJScript is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Core Security Outflank Security Tooling vs Fortra Cobalt Strike](https://cybersectools.com/compare/core-security-outflank-security-tooling-vs-fortra-cobalt-strike)
- [Core Security Outflank Security Tooling vs Core Security Cobalt Strike](https://cybersectools.com/compare/core-security-cobalt-strike-vs-core-security-outflank-security-tooling)
- [Core Security Outflank Security Tooling vs Core Security Bundles and Suites](https://cybersectools.com/compare/core-security-bundles-and-suites-vs-core-security-outflank-security-tooling)
- [GadgetToJScript vs Fortra Cobalt Strike](https://cybersectools.com/compare/fortra-cobalt-strike-vs-gadgettojscript)
- [GadgetToJScript vs Core Security Cobalt Strike](https://cybersectools.com/compare/core-security-cobalt-strike-vs-gadgettojscript)
- [GadgetToJScript vs Core Security Bundles and Suites](https://cybersectools.com/compare/core-security-bundles-and-suites-vs-gadgettojscript)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Core Security Outflank Security Tooling alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/core-security-outflank-security-tooling)
- [See all GadgetToJScript alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/gadgettojscript)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/core-security-outflank-security-tooling-vs-gadgettojscript

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/core-security-outflank-security-tooling.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Core Security Outflank Security Tooling and GadgetToJScript: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md