# Core Security Core Impact vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP): side-by-side comparison (2026) [Core Security Core Impact](https://cybersectools.com/tools/core-security-core-impact) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Core Security](https://cybersectools.com/companies/core-security). [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Hackurity](https://cybersectools.com/companies/hackurity). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Side-by-side comparison | | Core Security Core Impact | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Penetration Testing | Penetration Testing | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | On-Premises | Hybrid | | Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | Core Security | Hackurity | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Core Security Core Impact | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) | |---|---|---| | Exploitation Framework | Yes | – | | Red Team | Yes | – | | AI Pentesting | – | Yes | | Attack Paths | – | Yes | | Continuous Testing | – | Yes | | Vulnerability Exploitation | – | Yes | | Privilege Escalation | – | Yes | | Post Exploitation | – | Yes | | Supply Chain Security | – | Yes | | Security Validation | – | Yes | | Security Reporting | – | Yes | | Outsourced Security | – | Yes | ### Core features **Core Security Core Impact** 8 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Core Security Core Impact** 13 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)** No integrations listed. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [Core Security Core Impact](https://cybersectools.com/tools/core-security-core-impact) fits if you need to run it on your own servers. - [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options. ## Core Security Core Impact vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) FAQ Common questions when comparing Core Security Core Impact vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) for penetration testing. ### What is the difference between Core Security Core Impact and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)? **Core Security Core Impact**: Pen testing platform with guided automation and certified exploit library, built by Core Security. **Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**: Managed continuous autonomous pentesting using payload-less exploitation and attack paths, built by Hackurity. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Core Security Core Impact and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)? **Core Security Core Impact** is made by Core Security. **Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)** is made by Hackurity. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Core Security Core Impact a good alternative to Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)? Often, yes. Core Security Core Impact and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) are both Penetration Testing products. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Core Security Core Impact vs CodeWall AI-Powered Pentesting](https://cybersectools.com/compare/codewall-ai-powered-pentesting-vs-core-security-core-impact) - [Core Security Core Impact vs Nebula by BreachLine Labs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/breachline-nebula-vs-core-security-core-impact) - [Core Security Core Impact vs KinoSec Zeus](https://cybersectools.com/compare/core-security-core-impact-vs-kinosec-zeus) - [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs CodeWall AI-Powered Pentesting](https://cybersectools.com/compare/codewall-ai-powered-pentesting-vs-hackurity-art-stack) - [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Nebula by BreachLine Labs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/breachline-nebula-vs-hackurity-art-stack) - [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs KinoSec Zeus](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-kinosec-zeus) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Core Security Core Impact alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/core-security-core-impact) - [See all Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/hackurity-art-stack) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/core-security-core-impact-vs-hackurity-art-stack For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/core-security-core-impact.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Core Security Core Impact and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP): funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md