# Common Fate vs ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Common Fate](https://cybersectools.com/tools/common-fate) is a commercial [privileged access management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pam) solution by [Common Fate](https://cybersectools.com/companies/common-fate). [ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management](https://cybersectools.com/tools/threatlocker-elevation-control) is a commercial [privileged access management](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pam) solution by [ThreatLocker](https://cybersectools.com/companies/threatlocker). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

Need the answer fast? [Best PAM Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-pam-solutions) picks BeyondTrust Modern PAM, Palo Alto Networks Idira, Delinea Secret Server and 4 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Common Fate | ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | Privileged Access Management | Privileged Access Management |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Hybrid | On-Premises |
| Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | Common Fate | ThreatLocker |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Common Fate | ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management |
|---|---|---|
| PAM | Yes | Yes |
| AWS | Yes | – |
| GCP | Yes | – |
| Least Privilege | Yes | Yes |
| SSO | Yes | – |
| Policy | Yes | – |
| Windows Security | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Common Fate**

8 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**Common Fate**

12 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management**

No integrations listed.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Common Fate](https://cybersectools.com/tools/common-fate) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options.
- [ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management](https://cybersectools.com/tools/threatlocker-elevation-control) fits if you need to run it on your own servers.

## Common Fate vs ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management FAQ

Common questions when comparing Common Fate vs ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management for privileged access management.

### What is the difference between Common Fate and ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management?

**Common Fate**: JIT privileged access mgmt platform for cloud-native teams on AWS & GCP. Built by Common Fate.

**ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management**: Application-level admin elevation that removes standing local admin rights on endpoints. Built by ThreatLocker.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Common Fate and ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management?

**Common Fate** is made by Common Fate. **ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management** is made by ThreatLocker. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Common Fate a good alternative to ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management?

Often, yes. Common Fate and ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management are both Privileged Access Management products, and both cover Least Privilege, PAM. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Common Fate vs CyberFOX AutoElevate](https://cybersectools.com/compare/common-fate-vs-cyberfox-autoelevate)
- [Common Fate vs Venice PAM](https://cybersectools.com/compare/common-fate-vs-venice-pam)
- [Common Fate vs Idira](https://cybersectools.com/compare/common-fate-vs-idira)
- [ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management vs CyberFOX AutoElevate](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cyberfox-autoelevate-vs-threatlocker-elevation-control)
- [ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management vs Venice PAM](https://cybersectools.com/compare/threatlocker-elevation-control-vs-venice-pam)
- [ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management vs Idira](https://cybersectools.com/compare/idira-vs-threatlocker-elevation-control)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Common Fate alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/common-fate)
- [See all ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/threatlocker-elevation-control)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/common-fate-vs-threatlocker-elevation-control

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/common-fate.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Common Fate and ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md