# COGICEO Audits de code source vs Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence: side-by-side comparison (2026) [COGICEO Audits de code source](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cogiceo-audits-de-code-source) is a commercial [static application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/sast) solution by [COGICEO](https://cybersectools.com/companies/cogiceo). [Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence](https://cybersectools.com/tools/flyingduck-code-security-intelligence) is a commercial [static application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/sast) solution by [Flyingduck](https://cybersectools.com/companies/flyingduck). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. Need the answer fast? [Best SAST Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-sast-solutions) picks Checkmarx One Application Security Platform, Veracode Application Risk Management Platform, OpenText Fortify SAST and 4 more. ## Side-by-side comparison | | COGICEO Audits de code source | Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Static Application Security Testing | Static Application Security Testing | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | On-Premises | Cloud | | Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | COGICEO | Flyingduck | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | COGICEO Audits de code source | Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence | |---|---|---| | SAST | Yes | – | | Source Code Analysis | Yes | – | | OWASP | Yes | – | | Dynamic Analysis | Yes | – | | Authentication | Yes | – | | Security Audit | Yes | – | | PHP Security | Yes | – | | SQL Injection | Yes | – | | Vulnerabilities | Yes | – | | Secure Development | Yes | – | | License Compliance | – | Yes | | SBOM | – | Yes | | SCA | – | Yes | ### Core features **COGICEO Audits de code source** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **COGICEO Audits de code source** No integrations listed. **Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence** 1 integration listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [COGICEO Audits de code source](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cogiceo-audits-de-code-source) fits if you need to run it on your own servers. - [Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence](https://cybersectools.com/tools/flyingduck-code-security-intelligence) fits if you want a cloud product and you are a startup. ## COGICEO Audits de code source vs Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence FAQ Common questions when comparing COGICEO Audits de code source vs Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence for static application security testing. ### What is the difference between COGICEO Audits de code source and Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence? **COGICEO Audits de code source**: Manual and automated source code security audit service based on OWASP ASVS. Built by COGICEO. **Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence**: SAST tool that detects logical flaws and business logic vulnerabilities. Built by Flyingduck. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes COGICEO Audits de code source and Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence? **COGICEO Audits de code source** is made by COGICEO. **Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence** is made by Flyingduck. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is COGICEO Audits de code source a good alternative to Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence? Often, yes. COGICEO Audits de code source and Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence are both Static Application Security Testing products. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [COGICEO Audits de code source vs Redpoint Secure Code Review](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cogiceo-audits-de-code-source-vs-redpoint-secure-code-review) - [COGICEO Audits de code source vs QuestorAI](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cogiceo-audits-de-code-source-vs-questorai-vulndna) - [COGICEO Audits de code source vs SOOS SAST](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cogiceo-audits-de-code-source-vs-soos-sast) - [Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence vs Redpoint Secure Code Review](https://cybersectools.com/compare/flyingduck-code-security-intelligence-vs-redpoint-secure-code-review) - [Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence vs QuestorAI](https://cybersectools.com/compare/flyingduck-code-security-intelligence-vs-questorai-vulndna) - [Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence vs SOOS SAST](https://cybersectools.com/compare/flyingduck-code-security-intelligence-vs-soos-sast) ## Alternatives to each - [See all COGICEO Audits de code source alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/cogiceo-audits-de-code-source) - [See all Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/flyingduck-code-security-intelligence) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/cogiceo-audits-de-code-source-vs-flyingduck-code-security-intelligence For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/cogiceo-audits-de-code-source.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on COGICEO Audits de code source and Flyingduck Code Security Intelligence: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md