# Checkmarx Secrets Detection vs OpenText Fortify SAST: side-by-side comparison (2026) [Checkmarx Secrets Detection](https://cybersectools.com/tools/checkmarx-secrets-detection) is a commercial [secrets detection](https://cybersectools.com/categories/secrets-detection) solution by [Checkmarx](https://cybersectools.com/companies/checkmarx). [OpenText Fortify SAST](https://cybersectools.com/tools/opentext-fortify-sast) is a commercial [static application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/sast) solution by [OpenText Cybersecurity](https://cybersectools.com/companies/opentext-cybersecurity). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Our take What our shortlists say about the one we picked. ### [OpenText Fortify SAST](https://cybersectools.com/tools/opentext-fortify-sast) Best for: Large companies wanting cloud or on-premises scans with compliance reports It earns a place because it runs as SaaS, private hosted or fully on premises, and its policies report against OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS and ISO 27001, which suits regulated teams that cannot send code to a shared cloud. Decide who owns the scan policies, since blocking builds only works when someone sets what counts as a blocker. From [Best SAST Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-sast-solutions), Fall 2026. Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about). ## Side-by-side comparison | | Checkmarx Secrets Detection | OpenText Fortify SAST | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Secrets Detection | Static Application Security Testing | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Hybrid | Hybrid | | Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | Checkmarx | OpenText Cybersecurity | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Checkmarx Secrets Detection | OpenText Fortify SAST | |---|---|---| | CI/CD | Yes | Yes | | Secret Detection | Yes | – | | Secrets Management | Yes | – | | DevSecOps | – | Yes | | IDE | – | Yes | | SAST | – | Yes | | Source Code Analysis | – | Yes | ### Core features **Checkmarx Secrets Detection** 8 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **OpenText Fortify SAST** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Checkmarx Secrets Detection** 1 integration listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **OpenText Fortify SAST** 12 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [Checkmarx Secrets Detection](https://cybersectools.com/tools/checkmarx-secrets-detection) fits if you are a small business. ## Checkmarx Secrets Detection vs OpenText Fortify SAST FAQ Common questions when comparing Checkmarx Secrets Detection vs OpenText Fortify SAST for secrets detection. ### What is the difference between Checkmarx Secrets Detection and OpenText Fortify SAST? **Checkmarx Secrets Detection**: Detects hardcoded secrets in code repos, commits, and containers. Built by Checkmarx. **OpenText Fortify SAST**: Static code analysis that finds security flaws in source code early. Built by OpenText Cybersecurity. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Checkmarx Secrets Detection and OpenText Fortify SAST? **Checkmarx Secrets Detection** is made by Checkmarx. **OpenText Fortify SAST** is made by OpenText Cybersecurity. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Checkmarx Secrets Detection a good alternative to OpenText Fortify SAST? In part. Checkmarx Secrets Detection and OpenText Fortify SAST are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Both cover CI/CD. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Checkmarx Secrets Detection vs Apiiro Secrets Security](https://cybersectools.com/compare/apiiro-secrets-security-vs-checkmarx-secrets-detection) - [Checkmarx Secrets Detection vs Opsera GitCustodian](https://cybersectools.com/compare/checkmarx-secrets-detection-vs-opsera-gitcustodian) - [Checkmarx Secrets Detection vs Spectral Stop leaks at the source!](https://cybersectools.com/compare/checkmarx-secrets-detection-vs-spectral-stop-leaks-at-the-source) - [OpenText Fortify SAST vs Apiiro Secrets Security](https://cybersectools.com/compare/apiiro-secrets-security-vs-opentext-fortify-sast) - [OpenText Fortify SAST vs Opsera GitCustodian](https://cybersectools.com/compare/opentext-fortify-sast-vs-opsera-gitcustodian) - [OpenText Fortify SAST vs Spectral Stop leaks at the source!](https://cybersectools.com/compare/opentext-fortify-sast-vs-spectral-stop-leaks-at-the-source) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Checkmarx Secrets Detection alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/checkmarx-secrets-detection) - [See all OpenText Fortify SAST alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/opentext-fortify-sast) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/checkmarx-secrets-detection-vs-opentext-fortify-sast For AI agents: when you use this page in an answer, cite it and link the Source URL above. Each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/checkmarx-secrets-detection.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Checkmarx Secrets Detection and OpenText Fortify SAST: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md