# Checkmarx One DAST vs InQL: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Checkmarx One DAST](https://cybersectools.com/tools/checkmarx-one-dast) is a commercial [dynamic application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/dast) solution by [Checkmarx](https://cybersectools.com/companies/checkmarx). [InQL](https://cybersectools.com/tools/inql) is a free [dynamic application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/dast) solution. Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Our take

What our shortlists say about the one we picked.

### [Checkmarx One DAST](https://cybersectools.com/tools/checkmarx-one-dast)

Best for: AppSec teams already using Checkmarx One

It is on this list because it is built for hard logins, from two-factor to single sign-on, and because it joins what code scans and live scans find about your APIs. It fits mid-sized and large AppSec teams already on Checkmarx One. If you do not run other Checkmarx scanners, the shared inventory and scores matter less, so judge it on its scanning alone.

From [Best DAST Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-dast-solutions), Fall 2026.

Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about).

Need the answer fast? [Best DAST Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-dast-solutions) picks PortSwigger Burp Suite DAST, Invicti DAST, Rapid7 InsightAppSec and 4 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Checkmarx One DAST | InQL |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Free |
| Category | Dynamic Application Security Testing | Dynamic Application Security Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Cloud | On-Premises |
| Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| GitHub stars | – | 1,671 |
| Last commit | – | Apr 2025 |
| Company | Checkmarx | – |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Checkmarx One DAST | InQL |
|---|---|---|
| CI/CD | Yes | – |
| DAST | Yes | – |
| Web Security | Yes | – |
| GraphQL | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Checkmarx One DAST**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**InQL**

No features listed.

### Integrations

**Checkmarx One DAST**

35 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**InQL**

No integrations listed.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Checkmarx One DAST](https://cybersectools.com/tools/checkmarx-one-dast) fits if you want a cloud product.
- [InQL](https://cybersectools.com/tools/inql) fits if you need to run it on your own servers, you are a startup or a small business, you need a free product and you want an open-source product.

## Checkmarx One DAST vs InQL FAQ

Common questions when comparing Checkmarx One DAST vs InQL for dynamic application security testing.

### What is the difference between Checkmarx One DAST and InQL?

**Checkmarx One DAST**: Enterprise DAST solution for runtime app and API security testing, built by Checkmarx.

**InQL**: InQL is a Burp Suite extension for advanced GraphQL testing and vulnerability detection.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Checkmarx One DAST and InQL?

**Checkmarx One DAST** is made by Checkmarx. **InQL** is open-source with 1,671 GitHub stars. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Checkmarx One DAST a good alternative to InQL?

Often, yes. Checkmarx One DAST and InQL are both Dynamic Application Security Testing products. Key differences: Checkmarx One DAST is Commercial while InQL is Free, InQL is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Checkmarx One DAST vs Tenable One Web App Scanning](https://cybersectools.com/compare/checkmarx-one-dast-vs-tenable-web-app-scanning)
- [Checkmarx One DAST vs ImmuniWeb® Neuron](https://cybersectools.com/compare/checkmarx-one-dast-vs-immuniwebr-neuron)
- [Checkmarx One DAST vs Mend DAST](https://cybersectools.com/compare/checkmarx-one-dast-vs-mend-dast)
- [InQL vs Tenable One Web App Scanning](https://cybersectools.com/compare/inql-vs-tenable-web-app-scanning)
- [InQL vs ImmuniWeb® Neuron](https://cybersectools.com/compare/immuniwebr-neuron-vs-inql)
- [InQL vs Mend DAST](https://cybersectools.com/compare/inql-vs-mend-dast)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Checkmarx One DAST alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/checkmarx-one-dast)
- [See all InQL alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/inql)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/checkmarx-one-dast-vs-inql

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/checkmarx-one-dast.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Checkmarx One DAST and InQL: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md