# Certiv vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP): side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Certiv](https://cybersectools.com/tools/certiv) is a commercial [agentic AI security](https://cybersectools.com/categories/agentic-ai-security) solution by [Certiv](https://cybersectools.com/companies/certiv). [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Hackurity](https://cybersectools.com/companies/hackurity). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

Need the answer fast? [Best Agentic AI Security Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-agentic-ai-security-solutions) picks CrowdStrike Falcon Guardian, Rubrik Agent Cloud, Silverfort AI Agent Security and 5 more.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Certiv | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | Agentic AI Security | Penetration Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | Certiv | Hackurity |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Certiv | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic AI Security | Yes | – |
| LLM Security | Yes | – |
| MCP Security | Yes | – |
| Prompt Injection | Yes | – |
| Shadow AI | Yes | – |
| AI Observability | Yes | – |
| LLM Guardrails | Yes | – |
| OWASP | Yes | – |
| Runtime Security | Yes | – |
| Data Exfiltration | Yes | – |
| AI Pentesting | – | Yes |
| Attack Paths | – | Yes |
| Continuous Testing | – | Yes |
| Vulnerability Exploitation | – | Yes |
| Privilege Escalation | – | Yes |
| Post Exploitation | – | Yes |
| Supply Chain Security | – | Yes |
| Security Validation | – | Yes |
| Security Reporting | – | Yes |
| Outsourced Security | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Certiv**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**Certiv**

7 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**

No integrations listed.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Certiv](https://cybersectools.com/tools/certiv) fits if you are a small business.

## Certiv vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) FAQ

Common questions when comparing Certiv vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) for agentic AI security.

### What is the difference between Certiv and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)?

**Certiv**: Runtime security platform for discovering, monitoring, and controlling AI agents. Built by Certiv.

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**: Managed continuous autonomous pentesting using payload-less exploitation and attack paths. Built by Hackurity.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Certiv and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)?

**Certiv** is made by Certiv. **Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)** is made by Hackurity. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Certiv a good alternative to Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)?

In part. Certiv and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Certiv vs Tenet Security Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/certiv-vs-tenet-security-platform)
- [Certiv vs General Analysis AIDR](https://cybersectools.com/compare/certiv-vs-general-analysis-aidr)
- [Certiv vs Capsule Runtime Security for AI Agents](https://cybersectools.com/compare/capsule-runtime-security-for-ai-agents-vs-certiv)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Tenet Security Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-tenet-security-platform)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs General Analysis AIDR](https://cybersectools.com/compare/general-analysis-aidr-vs-hackurity-art-stack)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Capsule Runtime Security for AI Agents](https://cybersectools.com/compare/capsule-runtime-security-for-ai-agents-vs-hackurity-art-stack)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Certiv alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/certiv)
- [See all Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/hackurity-art-stack)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/certiv-vs-hackurity-art-stack

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/certiv.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Certiv and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP): funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md