# Cato Networks Universal ZTNA vs Firezone: side-by-side comparison (2026) [Cato Networks Universal ZTNA](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cato-networks-ztna) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [Cato Networks](https://cybersectools.com/companies/cato-networks). [Firezone](https://cybersectools.com/tools/firezone-ojlax) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [Firezone](https://cybersectools.com/companies/firezone). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Our take What our shortlists say about the one we picked. ### [Cato Networks Universal ZTNA](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cato-networks-ztna) Best for: Teams wanting agent or connector access from one cloud It earns its place because it is sold as its own product, licensed per user, so you can start with ZTNA and add other Cato modules later. That suits SMB to enterprise teams that want a path to a wider cloud platform without buying it all at once. Choose between agent and connector early, because the agent gives deeper endpoint visibility while connectors work on any platform. From [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions), Fall 2026. Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about). Need the answer fast? [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions) picks Zscaler Private Access (ZPA), Netskope One Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access ZTNA 2.0 and 4 more. ## Side-by-side comparison | | Cato Networks Universal ZTNA | Firezone | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Zero Trust Network Access | Zero Trust Network Access | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Cloud | Hybrid | | Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | Cato Networks | Firezone | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | Cato Networks Universal ZTNA | Firezone | |---|---|---| | Microsegmentation | Yes | – | | Remote Access | Yes | Yes | | ZTNA | Yes | Yes | | WireGuard | – | Yes | | Open Source | – | Yes | | Infrastructure | – | Yes | ### Core features **Cato Networks Universal ZTNA** 9 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Firezone** 9 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **Cato Networks Universal ZTNA** 24 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Firezone** 4 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [Cato Networks Universal ZTNA](https://cybersectools.com/tools/cato-networks-ztna) fits if you want a cloud product. - [Firezone](https://cybersectools.com/tools/firezone-ojlax) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options and you are a startup. ## Cato Networks Universal ZTNA vs Firezone FAQ Common questions when comparing Cato Networks Universal ZTNA vs Firezone for zero trust network access. ### What is the difference between Cato Networks Universal ZTNA and Firezone? **Cato Networks Universal ZTNA**: Cloud-based ZTNA solution for secure remote access to applications, built by Cato Networks. **Firezone**: Open-source WireGuard-based ZTNA platform for secure resource access, built by Firezone. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes Cato Networks Universal ZTNA and Firezone? **Cato Networks Universal ZTNA** is made by Cato Networks. **Firezone** is made by Firezone. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is Cato Networks Universal ZTNA a good alternative to Firezone? Often, yes. Cato Networks Universal ZTNA and Firezone are both Zero Trust Network Access products, and both cover ZTNA, Remote Access. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [Cato Networks Universal ZTNA vs NetBird Secure](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cato-networks-ztna-vs-netbird-secure) - [Cato Networks Universal ZTNA vs Zero Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cato-networks-ztna-vs-zero-secure-remote-access) - [Cato Networks Universal ZTNA vs NoPorts](https://cybersectools.com/compare/cato-networks-ztna-vs-noports) - [Firezone vs NetBird Secure](https://cybersectools.com/compare/firezone-ojlax-vs-netbird-secure) - [Firezone vs Zero Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/firezone-ojlax-vs-zero-secure-remote-access) - [Firezone vs NoPorts](https://cybersectools.com/compare/firezone-ojlax-vs-noports) ## Alternatives to each - [See all Cato Networks Universal ZTNA alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/cato-networks-ztna) - [See all Firezone alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/firezone-ojlax) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/cato-networks-ztna-vs-firezone-ojlax For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/cato-networks-ztna.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on Cato Networks Universal ZTNA and Firezone: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md