# BloodHound vs Webray RayBox: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[BloodHound](https://cybersectools.com/tools/bloodhound) is a free [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution. [Webray RayBox](https://cybersectools.com/tools/webray-raybox) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Webray (盛邦安全)](https://cybersectools.com/companies/webray). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | BloodHound | Webray RayBox |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free | Commercial |
| Category | Penetration Testing | Penetration Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Hybrid | On-Premises |
| Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| GitHub stars | 10,325 | – |
| Last commit | Aug 2025 | – |
| Company | – | Webray (盛邦安全) |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | BloodHound | Webray RayBox |
|---|---|---|
| Neo4j | Yes | – |
| Azure | Yes | – |
| Red Team | Yes | Yes |
| Attack Paths | Yes | – |
| Lateral Movement | Yes | – |
| Reconnaissance | Yes | Yes |
| Graph | Yes | – |
| Active Directory | Yes | – |
| Privilege Escalation | Yes | – |
| Penetration Testing Framework | – | Yes |
| Vulnerability Exploitation | – | Yes |
| Network Topology | – | Yes |
| Fingerprinting | – | Yes |
| Proof of Concept | – | Yes |
| Network Scanning | – | Yes |
| IoT Security | – | Yes |
| SCADA | – | Yes |

### Core features

**BloodHound**

No features listed.

**Webray RayBox**

8 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**BloodHound**

No integrations listed.

**Webray RayBox**

1 integration listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [BloodHound](https://cybersectools.com/tools/bloodhound) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options, you are a small business, you need a free product and you want an open-source product.
- [Webray RayBox](https://cybersectools.com/tools/webray-raybox) fits if you need to run it on your own servers.

## BloodHound vs Webray RayBox FAQ

Common questions when comparing BloodHound vs Webray RayBox for penetration testing.

### What is the difference between BloodHound and Webray RayBox?

**BloodHound**: BloodHound is a Javascript web application that uses graph theory to analyze Active Directory and Azure environments, revealing hidden relationships and potential attack paths through visual mapping.

**Webray RayBox**: Automated penetration testing appliance covering recon-to-exploitation attack chain. Built by Webray (盛邦安全).

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes BloodHound and Webray RayBox?

**BloodHound** is open-source with 10,325 GitHub stars. **Webray RayBox** is made by Webray (盛邦安全). The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is BloodHound a good alternative to Webray RayBox?

Often, yes. BloodHound and Webray RayBox are both Penetration Testing products, and both cover Reconnaissance, Red Team. Key differences: BloodHound is Free while Webray RayBox is Commercial, BloodHound is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [BloodHound vs OffSec Penetration Testing Services](https://cybersectools.com/compare/bloodhound-vs-offsec-penetration-testing-services)
- [BloodHound vs PT Dephaze](https://cybersectools.com/compare/bloodhound-vs-pt-dephaze)
- [BloodHound vs Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing](https://cybersectools.com/compare/bloodhound-vs-mgm-security-partners-infrastructure-penetration-testing)
- [Webray RayBox vs OffSec Penetration Testing Services](https://cybersectools.com/compare/offsec-penetration-testing-services-vs-webray-raybox)
- [Webray RayBox vs PT Dephaze](https://cybersectools.com/compare/pt-dephaze-vs-webray-raybox)
- [Webray RayBox vs Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing](https://cybersectools.com/compare/mgm-security-partners-infrastructure-penetration-testing-vs-webray-raybox)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all BloodHound alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/bloodhound)
- [See all Webray RayBox alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/webray-raybox)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/bloodhound-vs-webray-raybox

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/bloodhound.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on BloodHound and Webray RayBox: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md