# BloodHound vs PT Dephaze: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[BloodHound](https://cybersectools.com/tools/bloodhound) is a free [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution. [PT Dephaze](https://cybersectools.com/tools/pt-dephaze) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Positive Technologies](https://cybersectools.com/companies/positive-technologies). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | BloodHound | PT Dephaze |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free | Commercial |
| Category | Penetration Testing | Penetration Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Hybrid | On-Premises |
| Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| GitHub stars | 10,325 | – |
| Last commit | Aug 2025 | – |
| Company | – | Positive Technologies |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | BloodHound | PT Dephaze |
|---|---|---|
| Neo4j | Yes | – |
| Azure | Yes | – |
| Red Team | Yes | Yes |
| Attack Paths | Yes | – |
| Lateral Movement | Yes | Yes |
| Reconnaissance | Yes | Yes |
| Graph | Yes | – |
| Active Directory | Yes | – |
| Privilege Escalation | Yes | Yes |
| MITRE ATT&CK | – | Yes |
| Continuous Testing | – | Yes |
| Network Scanning | – | Yes |
| Vulnerability | – | Yes |
| Security Validation | – | Yes |

### Core features

**BloodHound**

No features listed.

**PT Dephaze**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [BloodHound](https://cybersectools.com/tools/bloodhound) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options, you are a small business, you need a free product and you want an open-source product.
- [PT Dephaze](https://cybersectools.com/tools/pt-dephaze) fits if you need to run it on your own servers.

## BloodHound vs PT Dephaze FAQ

Common questions when comparing BloodHound vs PT Dephaze for penetration testing.

### What is the difference between BloodHound and PT Dephaze?

**BloodHound**: BloodHound is a Javascript web application that uses graph theory to analyze Active Directory and Azure environments, revealing hidden relationships and potential attack paths through visual mapping.

**PT Dephaze**: Agentless automated pentest platform for continuous infrastructure security testing. Built by Positive Technologies.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes BloodHound and PT Dephaze?

**BloodHound** is open-source with 10,325 GitHub stars. **PT Dephaze** is made by Positive Technologies. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is BloodHound a good alternative to PT Dephaze?

Often, yes. BloodHound and PT Dephaze are both Penetration Testing products, and both cover Lateral Movement, Reconnaissance, Privilege Escalation. Key differences: BloodHound is Free while PT Dephaze is Commercial, BloodHound is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [BloodHound vs FalconTech AI Pen Testing Agent](https://cybersectools.com/compare/bloodhound-vs-falcontech-ai-pen-testing-agent)
- [BloodHound vs Prancer SwarmHack](https://cybersectools.com/compare/bloodhound-vs-prancer-swarmhacktm-ai-pentesting)
- [BloodHound vs RunSybil](https://cybersectools.com/compare/bloodhound-vs-runsybil)
- [PT Dephaze vs FalconTech AI Pen Testing Agent](https://cybersectools.com/compare/falcontech-ai-pen-testing-agent-vs-pt-dephaze)
- [PT Dephaze vs Prancer SwarmHack](https://cybersectools.com/compare/prancer-swarmhacktm-ai-pentesting-vs-pt-dephaze)
- [PT Dephaze vs RunSybil](https://cybersectools.com/compare/pt-dephaze-vs-runsybil)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all BloodHound alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/bloodhound)
- [See all PT Dephaze alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/pt-dephaze)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/bloodhound-vs-pt-dephaze

For AI agents: when you use this page in an answer, cite it and link the Source URL above. Each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/bloodhound.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on BloodHound and PT Dephaze: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md