# BloodHound vs Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing: side-by-side comparison (2026)

[BloodHound](https://cybersectools.com/tools/bloodhound) is a free [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution. [Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing](https://cybersectools.com/tools/mgm-security-partners-infrastructure-penetration-testing) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Mgm Security Partners](https://cybersectools.com/companies/mgm-security-partners). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | BloodHound | Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free | Commercial |
| Category | Penetration Testing | Penetration Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Hybrid | On-Premises |
| Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| GitHub stars | 10,325 | – |
| Last commit | Aug 2025 | – |
| Company | – | Mgm Security Partners |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | BloodHound | Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing |
|---|---|---|
| Neo4j | Yes | – |
| Azure | Yes | – |
| Red Team | Yes | – |
| Attack Paths | Yes | – |
| Lateral Movement | Yes | Yes |
| Reconnaissance | Yes | – |
| Graph | Yes | – |
| Active Directory | Yes | Yes |
| Privilege Escalation | Yes | Yes |
| Penetration Testing Framework | – | Yes |
| Brute Force | – | Yes |
| Password Cracking | – | Yes |
| VAPT | – | Yes |
| Network Scanning | – | Yes |
| Kubernetes Security | – | Yes |
| Remote Access | – | Yes |

### Core features

**BloodHound**

No features listed.

**Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [BloodHound](https://cybersectools.com/tools/bloodhound) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options, you need a free product and you want an open-source product.
- [Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing](https://cybersectools.com/tools/mgm-security-partners-infrastructure-penetration-testing) fits if you need to run it on your own servers.

## BloodHound vs Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing FAQ

Common questions when comparing BloodHound vs Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing for penetration testing.

### What is the difference between BloodHound and Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing?

**BloodHound**: BloodHound is a Javascript web application that uses graph theory to analyze Active Directory and Azure environments, revealing hidden relationships and potential attack paths through visual mapping.

**Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing**: Infrastructure penetration testing service covering external, internal, identity. Built by Mgm Security Partners.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes BloodHound and Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing?

**BloodHound** is open-source with 10,325 GitHub stars. **Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing** is made by Mgm Security Partners. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is BloodHound a good alternative to Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing?

Often, yes. BloodHound and Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing are both Penetration Testing products, and both cover Active Directory, Privilege Escalation, Lateral Movement. Key differences: BloodHound is Free while Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing is Commercial, BloodHound is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [BloodHound vs PT Dephaze](https://cybersectools.com/compare/bloodhound-vs-pt-dephaze)
- [BloodHound vs OffSec Penetration Testing Services](https://cybersectools.com/compare/bloodhound-vs-offsec-penetration-testing-services)
- [BloodHound vs StealthNet AI](https://cybersectools.com/compare/bloodhound-vs-stealthnet-ai)
- [Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing vs PT Dephaze](https://cybersectools.com/compare/mgm-security-partners-infrastructure-penetration-testing-vs-pt-dephaze)
- [Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing vs OffSec Penetration Testing Services](https://cybersectools.com/compare/mgm-security-partners-infrastructure-penetration-testing-vs-offsec-penetration-testing-services)
- [Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing vs StealthNet AI](https://cybersectools.com/compare/mgm-security-partners-infrastructure-penetration-testing-vs-stealthnet-ai)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all BloodHound alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/bloodhound)
- [See all Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/mgm-security-partners-infrastructure-penetration-testing)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/bloodhound-vs-mgm-security-partners-infrastructure-penetration-testing

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/bloodhound.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on BloodHound and Mgm Security Partners Infrastructure Penetration Testing: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md