# BBT.live BeTNA vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access: side-by-side comparison (2026) [BBT.live BeTNA](https://cybersectools.com/tools/bbtlive-betna) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [BBT.live (BeBroadband)](https://cybersectools.com/companies/bbtlive-bebroadband). [ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [ThreatLocker](https://cybersectools.com/companies/threatlocker). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. Need the answer fast? [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions) picks Zscaler Private Access (ZPA), Netskope One Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access ZTNA 2.0 and 4 more. ## Side-by-side comparison | | BBT.live BeTNA | ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Zero Trust Network Access | Zero Trust Network Access | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Cloud | Cloud | | Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | BBT.live (BeBroadband) | ThreatLocker | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | BBT.live BeTNA | ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access | |---|---|---| | ZTNA | Yes | Yes | | Microsegmentation | Yes | – | | SASE | Yes | – | | SD-WAN | Yes | – | | BYOD | Yes | – | | Zero Trust Architecture | – | Yes | | Remote Access | – | Yes | | Lateral Movement | – | Yes | | Authorization | – | Yes | | Network Protection | – | Yes | | Hybrid Work | – | Yes | | RDP | – | Yes | | Policy | – | Yes | | Least Privilege | – | Yes | ### Core features **BBT.live BeTNA** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access** 7 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **BBT.live BeTNA** 2 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access** No integrations listed. ## BBT.live BeTNA vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access FAQ Common questions when comparing BBT.live BeTNA vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access for zero trust network access. ### What is the difference between BBT.live BeTNA and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access? **BBT.live BeTNA**: ZTNA solution providing identity-based, continuous-verification network access control. Built by BBT.live (BeBroadband). **ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access**: ZTNA that brokers access from authorized users/devices to internal resources, no VPN. Built by ThreatLocker. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes BBT.live BeTNA and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access? **BBT.live BeTNA** is made by BBT.live (BeBroadband). **ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access** is made by ThreatLocker. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is BBT.live BeTNA a good alternative to ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access? Often, yes. BBT.live BeTNA and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access are both Zero Trust Network Access products, and both cover ZTNA. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [BBT.live BeTNA vs Threatmatic Zero Trust Edge](https://cybersectools.com/compare/bbtlive-betna-vs-threatmatic-zero-trust-edge) - [BBT.live BeTNA vs Zerac Zero Trust Security Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/bbtlive-betna-vs-zerac-zero-trust-security-platform) - [BBT.live BeTNA vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/bbtlive-betna-vs-quantlayer-secure-remote-access) - [ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access vs Threatmatic Zero Trust Edge](https://cybersectools.com/compare/threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access-vs-threatmatic-zero-trust-edge) - [ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access vs Zerac Zero Trust Security Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access-vs-zerac-zero-trust-security-platform) - [ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access vs QuantLayer Secure Remote Access](https://cybersectools.com/compare/quantlayer-secure-remote-access-vs-threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access) ## Alternatives to each - [See all BBT.live BeTNA alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/bbtlive-betna) - [See all ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/bbtlive-betna-vs-threatlocker-zero-trust-network-access For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/bbtlive-betna.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on BBT.live BeTNA and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Network Access: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md