# BBT.live BeTNA vs Microsoft Entra Private Access: side-by-side comparison (2026) [BBT.live BeTNA](https://cybersectools.com/tools/bbtlive-betna) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [BBT.live (BeBroadband)](https://cybersectools.com/companies/bbtlive-bebroadband). [Microsoft Entra Private Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/microsoft-entra-private-access) is a commercial [zero trust network access](https://cybersectools.com/categories/ztna) solution by [Microsoft](https://cybersectools.com/companies/microsoft). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Our take What our shortlists say about the one we picked. ### [Microsoft Entra Private Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/microsoft-entra-private-access) Best for: Companies that run identity on Microsoft Entra ID If identity already runs on Entra ID, this reuses your Conditional Access rules as access rules, so there is no second policy engine to run. The MFA for legacy protocols suits mid-market and enterprise estates with older Windows apps. Check licensing first, because users also need Entra ID P1 or P2. From [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions), Fall 2026. Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about). Need the answer fast? [Best ZTNA Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-ztna-solutions) picks Zscaler Private Access (ZPA), Netskope One Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access ZTNA 2.0 and 4 more. ## Side-by-side comparison | | BBT.live BeTNA | Microsoft Entra Private Access | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Zero Trust Network Access | Zero Trust Network Access | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Cloud | Hybrid | | Company size fit | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | BBT.live (BeBroadband) | Microsoft | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | BBT.live BeTNA | Microsoft Entra Private Access | |---|---|---| | ZTNA | Yes | Yes | | Microsegmentation | Yes | – | | SASE | Yes | – | | SD-WAN | Yes | – | | BYOD | Yes | Yes | | Least Privilege | – | Yes | | Remote Access | – | Yes | | SSO | – | Yes | ### Core features **BBT.live BeTNA** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Microsoft Entra Private Access** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **BBT.live BeTNA** 2 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Microsoft Entra Private Access** 9 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [BBT.live BeTNA](https://cybersectools.com/tools/bbtlive-betna) fits if you want a cloud product and you are a small business. - [Microsoft Entra Private Access](https://cybersectools.com/tools/microsoft-entra-private-access) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options. ## BBT.live BeTNA vs Microsoft Entra Private Access FAQ Common questions when comparing BBT.live BeTNA vs Microsoft Entra Private Access for zero trust network access. ### What is the difference between BBT.live BeTNA and Microsoft Entra Private Access? **BBT.live BeTNA**: ZTNA solution providing identity-based, continuous-verification network access control. Built by BBT.live (BeBroadband). **Microsoft Entra Private Access**: Identity-based zero trust access to private apps that replaces the legacy VPN. Built by Microsoft. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes BBT.live BeTNA and Microsoft Entra Private Access? **BBT.live BeTNA** is made by BBT.live (BeBroadband). **Microsoft Entra Private Access** is made by Microsoft. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is BBT.live BeTNA a good alternative to Microsoft Entra Private Access? Often, yes. BBT.live BeTNA and Microsoft Entra Private Access are both Zero Trust Network Access products, and both cover BYOD, ZTNA. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [BBT.live BeTNA vs GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture](https://cybersectools.com/compare/bbtlive-betna-vs-goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture) - [BBT.live BeTNA vs Threatmatic Zero Trust Edge](https://cybersectools.com/compare/bbtlive-betna-vs-threatmatic-zero-trust-edge) - [BBT.live BeTNA vs Zerac Zero Trust Security Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/bbtlive-betna-vs-zerac-zero-trust-security-platform) - [Microsoft Entra Private Access vs GoodAccess Zero Trust Architecture](https://cybersectools.com/compare/goodaccess-zero-trust-architecture-vs-microsoft-entra-private-access) - [Microsoft Entra Private Access vs Threatmatic Zero Trust Edge](https://cybersectools.com/compare/microsoft-entra-private-access-vs-threatmatic-zero-trust-edge) - [Microsoft Entra Private Access vs Zerac Zero Trust Security Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/microsoft-entra-private-access-vs-zerac-zero-trust-security-platform) ## Alternatives to each - [See all BBT.live BeTNA alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/bbtlive-betna) - [See all Microsoft Entra Private Access alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/microsoft-entra-private-access) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/bbtlive-betna-vs-microsoft-entra-private-access For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/bbtlive-betna.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on BBT.live BeTNA and Microsoft Entra Private Access: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md