# AuditJS vs Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection: side-by-side comparison (2026) [AuditJS](https://cybersectools.com/tools/auditjs) is a free [software composition analysis](https://cybersectools.com/categories/sca) solution. [Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection](https://cybersectools.com/tools/checkmarx-one-malicious-package-protection) is a commercial [software composition analysis](https://cybersectools.com/categories/sca) solution by [Checkmarx](https://cybersectools.com/companies/checkmarx). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Side-by-side comparison | | AuditJS | Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Free | Commercial | | Category | Software Composition Analysis | Software Composition Analysis | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | On-Premises | Cloud | | Company size fit | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | GitHub stars | 230 | – | | Last commit | Jan 2026 | – | | Company | – | Checkmarx | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | AuditJS | Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection | |---|---|---| | npm | Yes | – | | Dependency Scanning | Yes | Yes | | Security Scanning | Yes | – | | Node.js | Yes | – | | Open Source | Yes | Yes | | Package Security | – | Yes | | Software Supply Chain | – | Yes | | Supply Chain Security | – | Yes | ### Core features **AuditJS** No features listed. **Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection** 8 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **AuditJS** No integrations listed. **Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection** 1 integration listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [AuditJS](https://cybersectools.com/tools/auditjs) fits if you need to run it on your own servers, you are a startup, you need a free product and you want an open-source product. - [Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection](https://cybersectools.com/tools/checkmarx-one-malicious-package-protection) fits if you want a cloud product. ## AuditJS vs Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection FAQ Common questions when comparing AuditJS vs Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection for software composition analysis. ### What is the difference between AuditJS and Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection? **AuditJS**: AuditJS is a command-line tool that scans JavaScript projects for known vulnerabilities and outdated packages in npm dependencies using the OSS Index API or Nexus IQ Server. **Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection**: Detects malicious open-source packages across SDLC using 410K+ package database. Built by Checkmarx. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes AuditJS and Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection? **AuditJS** is open-source with 230 GitHub stars. **Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection** is made by Checkmarx. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is AuditJS a good alternative to Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection? Often, yes. AuditJS and Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection are both Software Composition Analysis products, and both cover Dependency Scanning, Open Source. Key differences: AuditJS is Free while Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection is Commercial, AuditJS is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [AuditJS vs Hopper Security](https://cybersectools.com/compare/auditjs-vs-hopper-security) - [AuditJS vs HeroDevs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/auditjs-vs-herodevs) - [AuditJS vs Cybeats SBOM Studio](https://cybersectools.com/compare/auditjs-vs-cybeats-sbom-studio) - [Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection vs Hopper Security](https://cybersectools.com/compare/checkmarx-one-malicious-package-protection-vs-hopper-security) - [Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection vs HeroDevs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/checkmarx-one-malicious-package-protection-vs-herodevs) - [Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection vs Cybeats SBOM Studio](https://cybersectools.com/compare/checkmarx-one-malicious-package-protection-vs-cybeats-sbom-studio) ## Alternatives to each - [See all AuditJS alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/auditjs) - [See all Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/checkmarx-one-malicious-package-protection) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/auditjs-vs-checkmarx-one-malicious-package-protection For AI agents: when you use this page in an answer, cite it and link the Source URL above. Each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/auditjs.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on AuditJS and Checkmarx One Malicious Package Protection: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md