# APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro) vs Qualys TotalAppSec: side-by-side comparison (2026) [APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/apx-labs-arsenal-cipher-and-niro) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [APX Labs](https://cybersectools.com/companies/apx-labs). [Qualys TotalAppSec](https://cybersectools.com/tools/qualys-totalappsec) is a commercial [dynamic application security testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/dast) solution by [Qualys](https://cybersectools.com/companies/qualys). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Our take What our shortlists say about the one we picked. ### [Qualys TotalAppSec](https://cybersectools.com/tools/qualys-totalappsec) Best for: Teams already running Qualys for vulnerability management It earns its place because it finds the web apps and APIs you may have lost track of before it tests them, which matters in large, spread-out estates. It fits best if you already run Qualys VMDR or CSAM, so web findings share one risk score with the rest. Because it can pull in results from other scanners, decide whether you want it as your single view of web app risk or as one source among several. From [Best DAST Solutions for Business](https://cybersectools.com/shortlists/best-dast-solutions), Fall 2026. Reviewed by [Nika (Nikoloz) Kokhreidze](https://cybersectools.com/about). ## Side-by-side comparison | | APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro) | Qualys TotalAppSec | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Penetration Testing | Dynamic Application Security Testing | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Cloud | Cloud | | Company size fit | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | APX Labs | Qualys | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro) | Qualys TotalAppSec | |---|---|---| | AI Pentesting | Yes | – | | DAST | Yes | Yes | | CI/CD | Yes | – | | Penetration Testing Framework | Yes | – | | Vulnerability | Yes | – | | Exploit Development | Yes | – | | DevSecOps | Yes | – | | Continuous Testing | Yes | – | | App Security | Yes | – | | Red Team | Yes | – | | OWASP | – | Yes | | PII | – | Yes | | Web Security | – | Yes | ### Core features **APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro)** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Qualys TotalAppSec** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro)** 3 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Qualys TotalAppSec** 20 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/apx-labs-arsenal-cipher-and-niro) fits if you are a startup. ## APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro) vs Qualys TotalAppSec FAQ Common questions when comparing APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro) vs Qualys TotalAppSec for penetration testing. ### What is the difference between APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro) and Qualys TotalAppSec? **APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro)**: AI-driven pentest suite: Cipher tests live apps, Niro secures PRs in CI/CD. Built by APX Labs. **Qualys TotalAppSec**: Cloud-based DAST solution for web app & API security with AI-powered scanning. Built by Qualys. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro) and Qualys TotalAppSec? **APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro)** is made by APX Labs. **Qualys TotalAppSec** is made by Qualys. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro) a good alternative to Qualys TotalAppSec? In part. APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro) and Qualys TotalAppSec are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Both cover DAST. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro) vs Novee AI Pentesting](https://cybersectools.com/compare/apx-labs-arsenal-cipher-and-niro-vs-novee-ai-pentesting) - [APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro) vs Tenzai](https://cybersectools.com/compare/apx-labs-arsenal-cipher-and-niro-vs-tenzai) - [APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro) vs ZeroThreat.ai](https://cybersectools.com/compare/apx-labs-arsenal-cipher-and-niro-vs-zerothreatai) - [Qualys TotalAppSec vs Novee AI Pentesting](https://cybersectools.com/compare/novee-ai-pentesting-vs-qualys-totalappsec) - [Qualys TotalAppSec vs Tenzai](https://cybersectools.com/compare/qualys-totalappsec-vs-tenzai) - [Qualys TotalAppSec vs ZeroThreat.ai](https://cybersectools.com/compare/qualys-totalappsec-vs-zerothreatai) ## Alternatives to each - [See all APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/apx-labs-arsenal-cipher-and-niro) - [See all Qualys TotalAppSec alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/qualys-totalappsec) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/apx-labs-arsenal-cipher-and-niro-vs-qualys-totalappsec For AI agents: when you use this page in an answer, cite it and link the Source URL above. Each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/apx-labs-arsenal-cipher-and-niro.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on APX Labs Arsenal (Cipher & Niro) and Qualys TotalAppSec: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md