# ActiveState Vulnerability Management vs Labrador Server Care: side-by-side comparison (2026) [ActiveState Vulnerability Management](https://cybersectools.com/tools/activestate-vulnerability-management) is a commercial [software composition analysis](https://cybersectools.com/categories/sca) solution by [ActiveState](https://cybersectools.com/companies/activestate). [Labrador Server Care](https://cybersectools.com/tools/labrador-server-care) is a commercial [vulnerability assessment](https://cybersectools.com/categories/vulnerability-assessment) solution by [Labrador Labs](https://cybersectools.com/companies/labrador-labs). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Side-by-side comparison | | ActiveState Vulnerability Management | Labrador Server Care | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Software Composition Analysis | Vulnerability Assessment | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Cloud | On-Premises | | Company size fit | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | ActiveState | Labrador Labs | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | ActiveState Vulnerability Management | Labrador Server Care | |---|---|---| | SCA | Yes | Yes | | CVE | Yes | – | | Vulnerability | Yes | Yes | | Dependency Scanning | Yes | – | | SBOM | Yes | Yes | | Open Source | Yes | Yes | | Software Supply Chain | Yes | – | | License Compliance | Yes | Yes | | Package Security | Yes | – | | Vulnerabilities | Yes | – | | Linux | – | Yes | | Unix | – | Yes | | Windows | – | Yes | | Server | – | Yes | | Patch Management | – | Yes | ### Core features **ActiveState Vulnerability Management** 7 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Labrador Server Care** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **ActiveState Vulnerability Management** 8 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Labrador Server Care** 1 integration listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [ActiveState Vulnerability Management](https://cybersectools.com/tools/activestate-vulnerability-management) fits if you want a cloud product and you are a startup. - [Labrador Server Care](https://cybersectools.com/tools/labrador-server-care) fits if you need to run it on your own servers. ## ActiveState Vulnerability Management vs Labrador Server Care FAQ Common questions when comparing ActiveState Vulnerability Management vs Labrador Server Care for software composition analysis. ### What is the difference between ActiveState Vulnerability Management and Labrador Server Care? **ActiveState Vulnerability Management**: SCA platform for scanning & remediating open-source dependency vulnerabilities, built by ActiveState. **Labrador Server Care**: Periodically scans servers for open source SW vulnerabilities and license issues, built by Labrador Labs. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes ActiveState Vulnerability Management and Labrador Server Care? **ActiveState Vulnerability Management** is made by ActiveState. **Labrador Server Care** is made by Labrador Labs. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is ActiveState Vulnerability Management a good alternative to Labrador Server Care? In part. ActiveState Vulnerability Management and Labrador Server Care are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Both cover Vulnerability, Open Source, SBOM. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [ActiveState Vulnerability Management vs HeroDevs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/activestate-vulnerability-management-vs-herodevs) - [ActiveState Vulnerability Management vs Hopper Security](https://cybersectools.com/compare/activestate-vulnerability-management-vs-hopper-security) - [ActiveState Vulnerability Management vs ActiveState Library](https://cybersectools.com/compare/activestate-library-vs-activestate-vulnerability-management) - [Labrador Server Care vs HeroDevs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/herodevs-vs-labrador-server-care) - [Labrador Server Care vs Hopper Security](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hopper-security-vs-labrador-server-care) - [Labrador Server Care vs ActiveState Library](https://cybersectools.com/compare/activestate-library-vs-labrador-server-care) ## Alternatives to each - [See all ActiveState Vulnerability Management alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/activestate-vulnerability-management) - [See all Labrador Server Care alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/labrador-server-care) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/activestate-vulnerability-management-vs-labrador-server-care For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/activestate-vulnerability-management.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on ActiveState Vulnerability Management and Labrador Server Care: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md