# ActiveState Vulnerability Management vs Labrador IVAS: side-by-side comparison (2026) [ActiveState Vulnerability Management](https://cybersectools.com/tools/activestate-vulnerability-management) is a commercial [software composition analysis](https://cybersectools.com/categories/sca) solution by [ActiveState](https://cybersectools.com/companies/activestate). [Labrador IVAS](https://cybersectools.com/tools/labrador-ivas) is a commercial [software composition analysis](https://cybersectools.com/categories/sca) solution by [Labrador Labs](https://cybersectools.com/companies/labrador-labs). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Side-by-side comparison | | ActiveState Vulnerability Management | Labrador IVAS | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Software Composition Analysis | Software Composition Analysis | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | Cloud | On-Premises | | Company size fit | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | ActiveState | Labrador Labs | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | ActiveState Vulnerability Management | Labrador IVAS | |---|---|---| | SCA | Yes | Yes | | CVE | Yes | Yes | | Vulnerability | Yes | Yes | | Dependency Scanning | Yes | – | | SBOM | Yes | – | | Open Source | Yes | Yes | | Software Supply Chain | Yes | – | | License Compliance | Yes | Yes | | Package Security | Yes | – | | Vulnerabilities | Yes | – | | Patch Management | – | Yes | | SSO | – | Yes | | Security Scanning | – | Yes | | Workflow | – | Yes | ### Core features **ActiveState Vulnerability Management** 7 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Labrador IVAS** 9 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **ActiveState Vulnerability Management** 8 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **Labrador IVAS** 4 integrations listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [ActiveState Vulnerability Management](https://cybersectools.com/tools/activestate-vulnerability-management) fits if you want a cloud product and you are a startup. - [Labrador IVAS](https://cybersectools.com/tools/labrador-ivas) fits if you need to run it on your own servers. ## ActiveState Vulnerability Management vs Labrador IVAS FAQ Common questions when comparing ActiveState Vulnerability Management vs Labrador IVAS for software composition analysis. ### What is the difference between ActiveState Vulnerability Management and Labrador IVAS? **ActiveState Vulnerability Management**: SCA platform for scanning & remediating open-source dependency vulnerabilities. Built by ActiveState. **Labrador IVAS**: Integrated portal for open source vulnerability analysis and action plan mgmt. Built by Labrador Labs. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes ActiveState Vulnerability Management and Labrador IVAS? **ActiveState Vulnerability Management** is made by ActiveState. **Labrador IVAS** is made by Labrador Labs. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is ActiveState Vulnerability Management a good alternative to Labrador IVAS? Often, yes. ActiveState Vulnerability Management and Labrador IVAS are both Software Composition Analysis products, and both cover Vulnerability, Open Source, SCA. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [ActiveState Vulnerability Management vs HeroDevs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/activestate-vulnerability-management-vs-herodevs) - [ActiveState Vulnerability Management vs Hopper Security](https://cybersectools.com/compare/activestate-vulnerability-management-vs-hopper-security) - [ActiveState Vulnerability Management vs ActiveState Library](https://cybersectools.com/compare/activestate-library-vs-activestate-vulnerability-management) - [Labrador IVAS vs HeroDevs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/herodevs-vs-labrador-ivas) - [Labrador IVAS vs Hopper Security](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hopper-security-vs-labrador-ivas) - [Labrador IVAS vs ActiveState Library](https://cybersectools.com/compare/activestate-library-vs-labrador-ivas) ## Alternatives to each - [See all ActiveState Vulnerability Management alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/activestate-vulnerability-management) - [See all Labrador IVAS alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/labrador-ivas) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/activestate-vulnerability-management-vs-labrador-ivas For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/activestate-vulnerability-management.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on ActiveState Vulnerability Management and Labrador IVAS: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md