# Active Directory Control Paths vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP): side-by-side comparison (2026)

[Active Directory Control Paths](https://cybersectools.com/tools/active-directory-control-paths) is a free [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution. [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Hackurity](https://cybersectools.com/companies/hackurity). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | Active Directory Control Paths | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free | Commercial |
| Category | Penetration Testing | Penetration Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | On-Premises | Hybrid |
| Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| GitHub stars | 680 | – |
| Last commit | Jan 2020 | – |
| Company | – | Hackurity |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | Active Directory Control Paths | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Neo4j | Yes | – |
| Enumeration | Yes | – |
| Visualization | Yes | – |
| Attack Paths | Yes | Yes |
| Reconnaissance | Yes | – |
| Graph | Yes | – |
| Active Directory | Yes | – |
| Privilege Escalation | Yes | Yes |
| AI Pentesting | – | Yes |
| Continuous Testing | – | Yes |
| Vulnerability Exploitation | – | Yes |
| Post Exploitation | – | Yes |
| Supply Chain Security | – | Yes |
| Security Validation | – | Yes |
| Security Reporting | – | Yes |
| Outsourced Security | – | Yes |

### Core features

**Active Directory Control Paths**

No features listed.

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [Active Directory Control Paths](https://cybersectools.com/tools/active-directory-control-paths) fits if you need to run it on your own servers, you need a free product and you want an open-source product.
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options.

## Active Directory Control Paths vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) FAQ

Common questions when comparing Active Directory Control Paths vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) for penetration testing.

### What is the difference between Active Directory Control Paths and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)?

**Active Directory Control Paths**: A tool for analyzing and visualizing control relationships and privilege escalation paths within Active Directory environments using graph-based representations.

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**: Managed continuous autonomous pentesting using payload-less exploitation and attack paths. Built by Hackurity.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes Active Directory Control Paths and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)?

**Active Directory Control Paths** is open-source with 680 GitHub stars. **Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)** is made by Hackurity. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is Active Directory Control Paths a good alternative to Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)?

Often, yes. Active Directory Control Paths and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) are both Penetration Testing products, and both cover Attack Paths, Privilege Escalation. Key differences: Active Directory Control Paths is Free while Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) is Commercial, Active Directory Control Paths is open-source. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [Active Directory Control Paths vs Nebula by BreachLine Labs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/active-directory-control-paths-vs-breachline-nebula)
- [Active Directory Control Paths vs Prancer SwarmHack](https://cybersectools.com/compare/active-directory-control-paths-vs-prancer-swarmhacktm-ai-pentesting)
- [Active Directory Control Paths vs KinoSec Zeus](https://cybersectools.com/compare/active-directory-control-paths-vs-kinosec-zeus)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Nebula by BreachLine Labs](https://cybersectools.com/compare/breachline-nebula-vs-hackurity-art-stack)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Prancer SwarmHack](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-prancer-swarmhacktm-ai-pentesting)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs KinoSec Zeus](https://cybersectools.com/compare/hackurity-art-stack-vs-kinosec-zeus)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all Active Directory Control Paths alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/active-directory-control-paths)
- [See all Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/hackurity-art-stack)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/active-directory-control-paths-vs-hackurity-art-stack

For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/active-directory-control-paths.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on Active Directory Control Paths and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP): funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md