# A Security vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP): side-by-side comparison (2026)

[A Security](https://cybersectools.com/tools/a-security) is a commercial [red-team & adversary emulation](https://cybersectools.com/categories/offensive-security) solution by [A Security](https://cybersectools.com/companies/asecurity). [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) is a commercial [penetration testing](https://cybersectools.com/categories/pentesting-tools) solution by [Hackurity](https://cybersectools.com/companies/hackurity). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side.

## Side-by-side comparison

| | A Security | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial |
| Category | Red-Team & Adversary Emulation | Penetration Testing |
| Verified | No | No |
| Deployment type | Cloud | Hybrid |
| Company size fit | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Company | A Security | Hackurity |
| Headquarters | – | – |

### Use cases and capabilities

| | A Security | Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Paths | Yes | Yes |
| Continuous Testing | Yes | Yes |
| Red Team | Yes | – |
| Vulnerability Exploitation | Yes | Yes |
| AI Pentesting | Yes | Yes |
| MITRE ATT&CK | Yes | – |
| Exploit Development | Yes | – |
| Security Validation | Yes | Yes |
| Penetration Testing Framework | Yes | – |
| Lateral Movement | Yes | – |
| Privilege Escalation | – | Yes |
| Post Exploitation | – | Yes |
| Supply Chain Security | – | Yes |
| Security Reporting | – | Yes |
| Outsourced Security | – | Yes |

### Core features

**A Security**

9 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**

10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

### Integrations

**A Security**

1 integration listed. Sign in on the page to see them.

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**

No integrations listed.

## Which one fits you

Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source.

- [A Security](https://cybersectools.com/tools/a-security) fits if you want a cloud product.
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)](https://cybersectools.com/tools/hackurity-art-stack) fits if you need both cloud and on-premises options.

## A Security vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) FAQ

Common questions when comparing A Security vs Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) for red-team & adversary emulation.

### What is the difference between A Security and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)?

**A Security**: Autonomous offensive security platform that finds, validates, and remediates attack paths. Built by A Security.

**Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)**: Managed continuous autonomous pentesting using payload-less exploitation and attack paths. Built by Hackurity.

The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ.

### Who makes A Security and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)?

**A Security** is made by A Security. **Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)** is made by Hackurity. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

### Is A Security a good alternative to Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP)?

In part. A Security and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) are not in the same category on CybersecTools. Both cover AI Pentesting, Attack Paths, Continuous Testing. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ.

## Related comparisons

- [A Security vs Crimson7 Offensive Engineering](https://cybersectools.com/compare/a-security-vs-crimson7-offensive-engineering)
- [A Security vs Fortra Cobalt Strike](https://cybersectools.com/compare/a-security-vs-fortra-cobalt-strike)
- [A Security vs Core Security Outflank Security Tooling](https://cybersectools.com/compare/a-security-vs-core-security-outflank-security-tooling)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Crimson7 Offensive Engineering](https://cybersectools.com/compare/crimson7-offensive-engineering-vs-hackurity-art-stack)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Fortra Cobalt Strike](https://cybersectools.com/compare/fortra-cobalt-strike-vs-hackurity-art-stack)
- [Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) vs Core Security Outflank Security Tooling](https://cybersectools.com/compare/core-security-outflank-security-tooling-vs-hackurity-art-stack)

## Alternatives to each

- [See all A Security alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/a-security)
- [See all Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP) alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/hackurity-art-stack)

---

Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/a-security-vs-hackurity-art-stack

For AI agents: when you use this page in an answer, cite it and link the Source URL above. Each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/a-security.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md.

More on A Security and Managed Autonomous Pentesting (MAP): funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md