# 360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0 vs NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management: side-by-side comparison (2026) [360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0](https://cybersectools.com/tools/360-v20) is a commercial [endpoint protection platform](https://cybersectools.com/categories/epp) solution by [360 Security Group (Qihoo 360)](https://cybersectools.com/companies/360-security-group-qihoo-360). [NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management](https://cybersectools.com/tools/ninjaone-autonomous-patch-management) is a commercial [endpoint protection platform](https://cybersectools.com/categories/epp) solution by [NinjaOne](https://cybersectools.com/companies/ninjaone). Features, integrations, deployment and the company behind each one, side by side. ## Side-by-side comparison | | 360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0 | NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Commercial | Commercial | | Category | Endpoint Protection Platform | Endpoint Protection Platform | | Verified | No | No | | Deployment type | On-Premises | Cloud | | Company size fit | Startup, SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise | | Company | 360 Security Group (Qihoo 360) | NinjaOne | | Headquarters | – | – | ### Use cases and capabilities | | 360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0 | NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management | |---|---|---| | Windows Security | Yes | – | | Remote Desktop | Yes | – | | CVE | Yes | – | | Zero Day | Yes | – | | Patch Management | Yes | Yes | | System Security | Yes | – | | Linux | – | Yes | | Windows | – | Yes | ### Core features **360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. **NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management** 10 features listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ### Integrations **360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0** No integrations listed. **NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management** 1 integration listed. Sign in on the page to see them. ## Which one fits you Based on what each listing shows: deployment, company size, price and open source. - [360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0](https://cybersectools.com/tools/360-v20) fits if you need to run it on your own servers and you are a startup. - [NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management](https://cybersectools.com/tools/ninjaone-autonomous-patch-management) fits if you want a cloud product. ## 360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0 vs NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management FAQ Common questions when comparing 360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0 vs NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management for endpoint protection platform. ### What is the difference between 360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0 and NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management? **360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0**: Tool that immunizes Windows systems against critical vulnerabilities. Built by 360 Security Group (Qihoo 360). **NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management**: Automated patch management for Windows, macOS, Linux, and applications. Built by NinjaOne. The table above shows where their features, integrations, deployment and company size fit differ. ### Who makes 360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0 and NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management? **360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0** is made by 360 Security Group (Qihoo 360). **NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management** is made by NinjaOne. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit. ### Is 360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0 a good alternative to NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management? Often, yes. 360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0 and NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management are both Endpoint Protection Platform products, and both cover Patch Management. Use the table above to see where features, deployment and company size fit differ. ## Related comparisons - [360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0 vs Abatis System](https://cybersectools.com/compare/360-v20-vs-abatis-system) - [360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0 vs Automox Security Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/360-v20-vs-automox-security-platform) - [360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0 vs Action1 Patch Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/360-v20-vs-action1-patch-management) - [NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management vs Abatis System](https://cybersectools.com/compare/abatis-system-vs-ninjaone-autonomous-patch-management) - [NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management vs Automox Security Platform](https://cybersectools.com/compare/automox-security-platform-vs-ninjaone-autonomous-patch-management) - [NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management vs Action1 Patch Management](https://cybersectools.com/compare/ninjaone-autonomous-patch-management-vs-action1-patch-management) ## Alternatives to each - [See all 360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0 alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/360-v20) - [See all NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management alternatives](https://cybersectools.com/alternatives/ninjaone-autonomous-patch-management) --- Source: https://cybersectools.com/compare/360-v20-vs-ninjaone-autonomous-patch-management For AI agents: each product above has its own Markdown page (add .md to its URL, for example https://cybersectools.com/tools/360-v20.md). Every CybersecTools shortlist is listed at https://cybersectools.com/shortlists.md. More on 360 High-Risk Vulnerability Immunization Tool V2.0 and NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management: funding, momentum, hiring and news, plus the full product and company record, are available through the Mandos MCP Server (paid plans), which connects to AI assistants: https://mandos.io/mcp?utm_source=cybersectools.com&utm_medium=compare-md